000151783 001__ 151783
000151783 005__ 20210129213546.0
000151783 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1093/jxb/eru305
000151783 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0022-0957
000151783 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1460-2431
000151783 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000343182800002
000151783 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:2606271
000151783 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:25118296
000151783 037__ $$aFZJ-2014-01665
000151783 041__ $$aEnglish
000151783 082__ $$a580
000151783 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSack, L.$$b0$$eCorresponding Author
000151783 245__ $$aLeaf mass per area is independent of vein length per area: avoiding pitfalls when modelling phenotypic integration (reply to Blonder et al. 2014) 
000151783 260__ $$aOxford$$bUniv. Press$$c2014
000151783 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1427207866_12597
000151783 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000151783 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000151783 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000151783 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000151783 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000151783 520__ $$aIt has been recently proposed that leaf vein length per area ( VLA ) is the major determinant of leaf mass per area ( LMA ), and would thereby determine other traits of the leaf economic spectrum (LES), such as photosynthetic rate per mass (A mass), nitrogen concentration per mass (N mass) and leaf lifespan (LL). In a previous paper we argued that this ‘vein origin’ hypothesis was supported only by a mathematical model with predestined outcomes, and that we found no support for the ‘vein origin’ hypothesis in our analyses of compiled data. In contrast to the ‘vein origin’ hypothesis, empirical evidence indicated that VLA and LMA are independent mechanistically, and VLA (among other vein traits) contributes to a higher photosynthetic rate per area (A area), which scales up to driving a higher A mass, all independently of LMA, N mass and LL. In their reply to our paper, Blonder et al. (2014) raised questions about our analysis of their model, but did not address our main point, that the data did not support their hypothesis. In this paper we provide further analysis of an extended data set, which again robustly demonstrates the mechanistic independence of LMA from VLA, and thus does not support the ‘vein origin’ hypothesis. We also address the four specific points raised by Blonder et al. (2014) regarding our analyses. We additionally show how this debate provides critical guidance for improved modelling of LES traits and other networks of phenotypic traits that determine plant performance under contrasting environments.
000151783 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89582$$a89582 - Plant Science (POF2-89582)$$cPOF2-89582$$fPOF II T$$x0
000151783 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, juser.fz-juelich.de
000151783 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aScoffoni, Ch.$$b1
000151783 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aJohn, G. P.$$b2
000151783 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129384$$aPoorter, Hendrik$$b3
000151783 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMason, C. M.$$b4
000151783 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMendez-Alonzo, R.$$b5
000151783 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDonovan, L. A.$$b6
000151783 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1466717-4$$a10.1093/jxb/eru305$$gp. eru305$$n18$$p5115-5123$$tThe @journal of experimental botany$$v65$$x0022-0957$$y2014
000151783 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/151783/files/FZJ-2014-01665.pdf$$yRestricted
000151783 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:151783$$pVDB
000151783 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129384$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b3$$kFZJ
000151783 9132_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lKey Technologies for the Bioeconomy$$vPlant Science$$x0
000151783 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89582$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-890$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-800$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bProgrammungebundene Forschung$$lohne Programm$$vPlant Science$$x0
000151783 9141_ $$y2014
000151783 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$2StatID$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000151783 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR
000151783 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000151783 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000151783 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000151783 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000151783 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000151783 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000151783 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000151783 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0400$$2StatID$$aAllianz-Lizenz / DFG
000151783 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000151783 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences
000151783 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000151783 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000151783 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118$$kIBG-2$$lPflanzenwissenschaften$$x0
000151783 980__ $$ajournal
000151783 980__ $$aVDB
000151783 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000151783 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED