% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Stubenrauch:153337,
      author       = {Stubenrauch, Christa and Freund, Juliane and Alecu de
                      Flers, Simone and Scharke, Wolfgang and Braun, Mario and
                      Jacobs, Arthur M. and Konrad, Kerstin},
      title        = {{N}onword reading and {S}troop interference: {W}hat
                      differentiates attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and
                      reading disability?},
      journal      = {Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology},
      volume       = {36},
      number       = {3},
      issn         = {1744-411X},
      address      = {London [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Psychology Press66848},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2014-02969},
      pages        = {244 - 260},
      year         = {2014},
      abstract     = {Background: Attention deficits and impaired reading
                      performance co-occur more often than expected by chance;
                      however, the underlying mechanism of this association still
                      remains rather unexplored. Method: In two consecutive
                      studies, children aged 8 to 12 years with
                      attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and children
                      with reading disability (RD) were examined using a 2 (ADHD
                      versus no ADHD) × 2 (RD versus no RD) factorial design. To
                      further delineate deficient interference control from
                      reading processes, we used a newly developed self-paced
                      word/nonword reading task (Experiment 1, n = 68) and a
                      modified computerized Stroop paradigm, including an
                      orthographic phonological neighbor (OPN) condition
                      (Experiment 2, n = 84). Results: RD (compared to non-RD
                      groups) was associated with impairments in both word and
                      nonword reading, while children with ADHD also showed
                      impaired nonword reading. In the Stroop task, RD, but not
                      ADHD, had a significant impact on task performance.
                      Interestingly, a significant interaction between ADHD, RD,
                      and task condition emerged, which was due to particularly
                      slower reaction times to nonwords in children with RD only,
                      while task performance in children with comorbid ADHD and RD
                      resembled that of ADHD only. Conclusions: Thus, our results
                      demonstrate that impairments in nonword reading were not
                      specific to RD but were also present in children with ADHD.
                      In addition, RD and not ADHD was characterized by poor
                      interference control in the Stroop task. These findings
                      question whether unique cognitive deficits are specific to
                      either ADHD or RD.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {150},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {333 - Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Neurological and
                      Psychiatric Diseases (POF2-333) / 89572 - (Dys-)function and
                      Plasticity (POF2-89572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF2-333 / G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000334032600003},
      doi          = {10.1080/13803395.2013.878690},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/153337},
}