% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Jadoon:15382,
author = {Jadoon, K.Z. and Lambot, S. and Slob, E.C. and Vereecken,
H.},
title = {{A}nalysis of {H}orn {A}ntenna {T}ransfer {F}unctions and
{P}hase-{C}enter {P}osition for {M}odeling {O}ff-{G}round
{GPR}},
journal = {IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing},
volume = {49},
issn = {0196-2892},
address = {New York, NY},
publisher = {IEEE},
reportid = {PreJuSER-15382},
pages = {1649 - 1662},
year = {2011},
note = {This work was supported by the Forschungszentrum Julich
GmbH (Germany), the Universite Catholique de Louvain and
Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (Belgium), Delft
University of Technology (The Netherlands), and DIGISOIL
project financed by the European Commission under the
Seventh Framework Program for Research and Technological
Development, Area "Environment," Activity 6.3 "Environmental
Technologies."},
abstract = {The antenna of a zero-offset off-ground ground-penetrating
radar can be accurately modeled using a linear system of
frequency-dependent complex scalar transfer functions under
the assumption that the electric field measured by the
antenna locally tends to a plane wave. First, we analyze to
which extent this hypothesis holds as a function of the
antenna height above a multilayered medium. Second, we
compare different methods to estimate the antenna phase
center, namely, 1) extrapolation of peak-to-peak reflection
values in the time domain and 2) frequency-domain
full-waveform inversion assuming both frequency-independent
and -dependent phase centers. For that purpose, we performed
radar measurements at different heights above a perfect
electrical conductor. Two different horn antennas operating,
respectively, in the frequency ranges 0.2-2.0 and 0.8-2.6
GHz were used and compared. In the limits of the antenna
geometry, we observed that antenna modeling results were not
significantly affected by the position of the phase center.
This implies that the transfer function model inherently
accounts for the phase-center positions. The results also
showed that the antenna transfer function model is valid
only when the antenna is not too close to the reflector,
namely, the threshold above which it holds corresponds to
the antenna size. The effect of the frequency dependence of
the phase-center position was further tested for a
two-layered sandy soil subject to different water contents.
The results showed that the proposed antenna model avoids
the need for phase-center determination for proximal soil
characterization.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Geochemistry $\&$ Geophysics / Engineering, Electrical $\&$
Electronic / Remote Sensing},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000289906200014},
doi = {10.1109/TGRS.2010.2089691},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/15382},
}