001     153891
005     20220930130029.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.gca.2014.04.037
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0016-7037
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1872-9533
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a WOS:000339176400004
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2014-03362
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a Heil, Jannis
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)144687
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Site-specific 15N isotopic signatures of abiotically produced N$_{2}$O
260 _ _ |a New York, NY [u.a.]
|c 2014
|b Elsevier
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1401858991_21127
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
520 _ _ |a Efficient nitrous oxide (N2O) mitigation strategies require the identification of the main source and sink processes and their contribution to total soil N2O production. Several abiotic reactions of nitrification intermediates leading to N2O production are known, but their contribution to total N2O production in soils is uncertain. As the site preference (SP) of 15N in N2O is a promising tool to give more insight into N2O production processes, we investigated the SP of N2O produced by different abiotic reactions in a laboratory study. All reactions involved the nitrification intermediate hydroxylamine (NH2OH) in combination with nitrite (NO2−), Fe3+, Fe2+ and Cu2+, reactants commonly or potentially found in soils, at different concentrations and pH values. N2O production and its four main isotopic species (14N14N16O, 15N14N16O, 14N15N16O, and 14N14N18O) were quantified simultaneously and online at high temporal resolution using quantum cascade laser absorption spectroscopy. Thereby, our study presents the first continuous analysis of δ18O in N2O. The experiments revealed the possibility of purely abiotic reactions over a wide range of acidity (pH 3–8) by different mechanisms. All studied abiotic pathways produced N2O with a characteristic SP in the range of 34–35‰, unaffected by process conditions and remaining constant over the course of the experiments. These findings reflect the benefit of continuous N2O isotopic analysis by laser spectroscopy, contribute new information to the challenging source partitioning of N2O emissions from soils, and emphasize the potentially significant role of coupled biotic–abiotic reactions in soils.
536 _ _ |a 246 - Modelling and Monitoring Terrestrial Systems: Methods and Technologies (POF2-246)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-246
|c POF2-246
|f POF II
|x 0
536 _ _ |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|c POF3-255
|f POF III
|x 1
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Wolf, Benjamin
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Brüggemann, Nicolas
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)142357
|b 2
|e Corresponding Author
700 1 _ |a Emmenegger, Lukas
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Tuzson, Béla
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Vereecken, Harry
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129549
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Mohn, Joachim
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.gca.2014.04.037
|g Vol. 139, p. 72 - 82
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1483679-8
|p 72 - 82
|t Geochimica et cosmochimica acta
|v 139
|y 2014
|x 0016-7037
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/153891/files/FZJ-2014-03362.pdf
|z Published final document.
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:153891
|p OpenAPC
|p VDB
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
|p openCost
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)144687
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)142357
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129549
913 2 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Marine, Küsten- und Polare Systeme
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Erde und Umwelt
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-240
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-246
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200
|v Modelling and Monitoring Terrestrial Systems: Methods and Technologies
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF2
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
|x 1
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Erde und Umwelt
914 1 _ |y 2014
915 _ _ |a JCR/ISI refereed
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1040
|2 StatID
|b Zoological Record
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a APC


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21