% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Ravenek:153959,
author = {Ravenek, Janneke M. and Bessler, Holger and Engels,
Christof and Scherer-Lorenzen, Michael and Gessler, Arthur
and Gockele, Annette and De Luca, Enrica and Ebeling, Anne
and Roscher, Christiane and Schmid, Bernhard and Weisser,
Wolfgang W. and Wirth, Christian and de Kroon, Hans and
Weigelt, Alexandra and Mommer, Liesje and Temperton, Vicky},
title = {{L}ong-term study of root biomass in a biodiversity
experiment reveals shifts in diversity effects over time},
journal = {Oikos},
volume = {123},
number = {12},
issn = {0030-1299},
address = {Oxford},
publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
reportid = {FZJ-2014-03399},
pages = {1528–1536},
year = {2014},
abstract = {Biodiversity experiments generally report a positive effect
of plant biodiversity on aboveground biomass (overyielding),
which typically increases with time. Various studies also
found overyielding for belowground plant biomass, but this
has never been measured over time. Also, potential
underlying mechanisms have remained unclear. Differentiation
in rooting patterns among plant species and plant functional
groups has been proposed as a main driver of the observed
biodiversity effect on belowground biomass, leading to more
efficient belowground resource use with increasing
diversity, but so far there is little evidence to support
this. We analyzed standing root biomass and its distribution
over the soil profile, along a 1–16 species richness
gradient over eight years in the Jena Experiment in Germany,
and compared belowground to aboveground overyielding.In our
long-term dataset, total root biomass increased with
increasing species richness but this effect was only
apparent after four years. The increasingly positive
relationship between species richness and root biomass,
explaining $12\%$ of overall variation and up to $28\%$ in
the last year of our study, was mainly due to decreasing
root biomass at low diversity over time. Functional group
composition strongly affected total standing root biomass,
explaining $44\%$ of variation, with grasses and legumes
having strong overall positive and negative effects,
respectively. Functional group richness or interactions
between functional group presences did not strongly
contribute to overyielding. We found no support for the
hypothesis that vertical root differentiation increases with
species richness, with functional group richness or
composition. Other explanations, such as stronger negative
plant–soil feedbacks in low-diverse plant communities on
standing root biomass and vertical distribution should be
considered.},
cin = {IBG-2},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {89582 - Plant Science (POF2-89582)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89582},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000345306600013},
doi = {10.1111/oik.01502},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/153959},
}