000154372 001__ 154372
000154372 005__ 20240709074351.0
000154372 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1142/S0217979214820013
000154372 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000334692200002
000154372 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:21823633
000154372 037__ $$aFZJ-2014-03720
000154372 082__ $$a530
000154372 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129138$$aMüller, Rolf$$b0$$eCorresponding Author$$ufzj
000154372 245__ $$aComment on 'Cosmic-ray-driven reaction and greenhouse effect of halogenated molecules: Culprits for atmospheric ozone depletion and global climate change'
000154372 260__ $$aSingapore [u.a.]$$bWorld Scientific Publ.$$c2014
000154372 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1404891725_32147
000154372 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000154372 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000154372 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000154372 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000154372 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000154372 520__ $$aLu's "cosmic-ray-driven electron-induced reaction (CRE) theory" is based on the assumption that the CRE reaction of halogenated molecules (e.g., chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), HCl, ClONO2) adsorbed or trapped in polar stratospheric clouds in the winter polar stratosphere is the key step in forming photoactive halogen species that are the cause of the springtime ozone hole. This theory has been extended to a warming theory of halogenated molecules for climate change. In this comment, we discuss the chemical and physical foundations of these theories and the conclusions derived from the theories. First, it is unclear whether the loss rates of halogenated molecules induced by dissociative electron attachment (DEA) observed in the laboratory can also be interpreted as atmospheric loss rates, but even if this were the case, the impact of DEA-induced reactions on polar chlorine activation and ozone loss in the stratosphere is limited. Second, we falsify several conclusions that are reported on the basis of the CRE theory: There is no polar ozone loss in darkness, there is no apparent 11-year periodicity in polar total ozone measurements, the age of air in the polar lower stratosphere is much older than 1–2 years, and the reported detection of a pronounced recovery (by about 20–25%) in Antarctic total ozone measurements by the year 2010 is in error. There are also conclusions about the future development of sea ice and global sea level which are fundamentally flawed because Archimedes' principle is neglected. Many elements of the CRE theory are based solely on correlations between certain datasets which are no substitute for providing physical and chemical mechanisms causing a particular behavior noticeable in observations. In summary, the CRE theory cannot be considered as an independent, alternative mechanism for polar stratospheric ozone loss and the conclusions on recent and future surface temperature and global sea level change do not have a physical basis.
000154372 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-234$$a234 - Composition and Dynamics of the Upper Troposphere and Stratosphere (POF2-234)$$cPOF2-234$$fPOF II$$x0
000154372 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, juser.fz-juelich.de
000154372 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129122$$aGrooß, Jens-Uwe$$b1$$ufzj
000154372 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2086681-1$$a10.1142/S0217979214820013$$n13$$p1482001$$tInternational journal of modern physics / B$$v28$$x0217-9792$$y2014
000154372 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:154372$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pVDB
000154372 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129138$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b0$$kFZJ
000154372 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129122$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b1$$kFZJ
000154372 9132_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-244$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-240$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$aDE-HGF$$bMarine, Küsten- und Polare Systeme$$lAtmosphäre und Klima$$vComposition and dynamics of the upper troposphere and middle atmosphere$$x0
000154372 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-234$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF2-230$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF2$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lAtmosphäre und Klima$$vComposition and Dynamics of the Upper Troposphere and Stratosphere$$x0
000154372 9141_ $$y2014
000154372 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$2StatID$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000154372 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR
000154372 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000154372 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000154372 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000154372 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000154372 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000154372 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1040$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bZoological Record
000154372 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013$$kIEK-7$$lStratosphäre$$x0
000154372 980__ $$ajournal
000154372 980__ $$aVDB
000154372 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
000154372 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000154372 981__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)ICE-4-20101013