001     154644
005     20240313095011.0
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2014-03928
100 1 _ |a Zehl, Lyuba
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)145394
|b 0
|e Corresponding Author
111 2 _ |a AREADNE 2014
|c Santorini
|d 2014-06-25 - 2014-06-29
|w Greece
245 _ _ |a Metadata management for complex neurophysiological experiments
260 _ _ |c 2014
336 7 _ |a Abstract
|b abstract
|m abstract
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)1
|s 1409229095_6671
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Conference Paper
|0 33
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Conference Abstract
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a OTHER
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a conferenceObject
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a INPROCEEDINGS
|2 BibTeX
500 _ _ |a Acknowledgments: SMHB, HBP (EU grant 604102), G-Node (BMBF Grant 01GQ1302), BrainScaleS (EU Grant269912), ANR-GRASP, Neuro_IC2010, CNRS-PEPS, Riken-CNRS Research Agreement. References: [1] Grewe J, Wachtler T, and Benda J (2011) Front. Neuroinform. 5:16[2] Riehle A, Wirtssohn S, Grün S, and Brochier T (2013) Front. Neural Circuits 7:48
520 _ _ |a Technological progress in neuroscience allows recording from tens to hundreds of neuronssimultaneously, both in vitro and in vivo, using various recording techniques (e.g., multi-electrode recordings) and stimulation methods (e.g., optogenetics). In addition, recordingscan be performed in parallel from multiple brain areas, under more or less naturalconditions in (almost) freely behaving animals. Consequently, electrophysiologicalexperiments become increasingly complex. Moreover, to disentangle the relationship tobehavior, it is necessary to document animal training, experimental procedures, and detailsof the setup along with recorded neuronal and behavioral data. Considering this, availabilityof the information about the experimental conditions, commonly referred to as metadata, isof extreme relevance for reproducible data analysis and correct interpretation of results.Typically, experimenters have developed their own personal procedure to document theirexperiment, allowing at best other members of the lab to share data and metadata.However, at the latest when it comes to data sharing across labs, details may be missed. Inparticular if collaborating groups have different scientific backgrounds, implicit knowledge isoften not communicated. In order to perform interpretable analysis, each data set shouldtherefore clearly link to metadata annotations about experimental conditions such as theperformed task, quality of the data, or relevant preprocessing (e.g., spike sorting).In order to provide metadata in an organized, easily accessible, but also machine-readableway, an XML based file format, odML (open metadata Markup Language), was proposed [1].Here we will demonstrate the usefulness of standardized metadata collections for handlingthe data and their analysis in the context of a complex behavioral (reach to grasp)experiment with neuronal recordings from a large number of electrodes (Utah array)delivering massively parallel spike and LFP data [2]. We illustrate the conceptual design ofan odML metadata structure and provide a practical introduction on how to generate anodML file. In addition, we offer odML templates to facilitate the usage of odML acrossdifferent laboratories and experimental contexts. We demonstrate hands-on the advantagesof using odML to screen large numbers of data sets according to selection criteria (e.g.,behavioral performance) relevant for subsequent analyses (see companion posters byDenker et al. and Riehle et al.). Well organized metadata management is a key componentto guarantee reproducibility of experiments and to track provenance of performed analyses.
536 _ _ |a 331 - Signalling Pathways and Mechanisms in the Nervous System (POF2-331)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-331
|c POF2-331
|f POF II
|x 0
536 _ _ |a BRAINSCALES - Brain-inspired multiscale computation in neuromorphic hybrid systems (269921)
|0 G:(EU-Grant)269921
|c 269921
|f FP7-ICT-2009-6
|x 1
536 _ _ |a HBP - The Human Brain Project (604102)
|0 G:(EU-Grant)604102
|c 604102
|f FP7-ICT-2013-FET-F
|x 2
536 _ _ |a SMHB - Supercomputing and Modelling for the Human Brain (HGF-SMHB-2013-2017)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)HGF-SMHB-2013-2017
|c HGF-SMHB-2013-2017
|f SMHB
|x 3
536 _ _ |a 89571 - Connectivity and Activity (POF2-89571)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89571
|c POF2-89571
|x 4
|f POF II T
700 1 _ |a Denker, Michael
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)144807
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Stoewer, Adrian
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Jaillet, Florent
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Brochier, Thomas
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Riehle, Alexa
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Wachtler, Thomas
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Grün, Sonja
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)144168
|b 7
773 _ _ |y 2014
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:154644
|p VDB
|p ec_fundedresources
|p openaire
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)145394
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)144807
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 7
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)144168
913 2 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-571
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Connectivity and Activity
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Funktion und Dysfunktion des Nervensystems
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-330
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-331
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-300
|v Signalling Pathways and Mechanisms in the Nervous System
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF2
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89571
|v Connectivity and Activity
|x 1
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-890
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-800
|b Programmungebundene Forschung
|l ohne Programm
914 1 _ |y 2014
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-6-20090406
|k INM-6
|l Computational and Systems Neuroscience
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828
|k IAS-6
|l Theoretical Neuroscience
|x 1
980 _ _ |a abstract
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-6-20090406
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IAS-6-20130828


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21