001     155462
005     20240712100849.0
024 7 _ |a 2128/11504
|2 Handle
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2014-04628
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a Fahey, D. W. F.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
245 _ _ |a The AquaVIT-1 Intercomparison of Atmosheric Water Vapor Measurements Techniques
260 _ _ |a Katlenburg-Lindau
|c 2014
|b Copernicus
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1409303188_6679
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
520 _ _ |a The AquaVIT-1 Intercomparison of Atmospheric Water Vapor Measurement Techniques was conducted at the aerosol and cloud simulation chamber AIDA at the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany, in October 2007. The overall objective was to intercompare state-of-the-art and prototype atmospheric hygrometers with each other and with independent humidity standards under controlled conditions. This activity was conducted as a blind intercomparison with coordination by selected referees. The effort was motivated by persistent discrepancies found in atmospheric measurements involving multiple instruments operating on research aircraft and balloon platforms, particularly in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere where water vapor reaches its lowest atmospheric values (less than 10 ppm). With the AIDA chamber volume of 84 m3, multiple instruments analyzed air with a common water vapor mixing ratio, either by extracting air into instrument flow systems, locating instruments inside the chamber, or sampling the chamber volume optically. The intercomparison was successfully conducted over 10 days during which pressure, temperature, and mixing ratio were systematically varied (50 to 500 hPa, 185 to 243 K, and 0.3 to 152 ppm). In the absence of an accepted reference instrument, the reference value was taken to be the ensemble mean of a core subset of the measurements. For these core instruments, the agreement between 10 and 150 ppm of water vapor is considered good with variation about the reference value of about ±10% (±1σ). In the region of most interest between 1 and 10 ppm, the core subset agreement is fair with variation about the reference value of ±20% (±1σ). The upper limit of precision was also derived for each instrument from the reported data. These results indicate that the core instruments, in general, have intrinsic skill to determine unknown water vapor mixing ratios with an accuracy of at least ±20%. The implication for atmospheric measurements is that the substantially larger differences observed during in-flight intercomparisons stem from other factors associated with the moving platforms or the non-laboratory environment. The success of AquaVIT-1 provides a template for future intercomparison efforts with water vapor or other species that are focused on improving the analytical quality of atmospheric measurements on moving platforms.
536 _ _ |a 234 - Composition and Dynamics of the Upper Troposphere and Stratosphere (POF2-234)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-234
|c POF2-234
|f POF II
|x 0
700 1 _ |a Gao, R. S. G.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Möhler, O. M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Saathoff, H. S.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Schiller, C.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Ebert, V. E.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Krämer, Martina
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129131
|b 6
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Peter, T. P.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Amarouche, N. A.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Avallone, L. M. A.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Bauer, Reimar
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)139077
|b 10
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Bozóki, Z. B.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Christensen, L. E. C.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 12
700 1 _ |a Davis, S. M. D.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 13
700 1 _ |a Durry, G. D.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 14
700 1 _ |a Dyroff, C. D.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 15
700 1 _ |a Herman, R. L. H.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 16
700 1 _ |a Hunsmann, S. H.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 17
700 1 _ |a Khaykin, S. K.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 18
700 1 _ |a Mackrodt, P. M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 19
700 1 _ |a Meyer, J. M.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 20
700 1 _ |a Smith, J. B. S.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 21
700 1 _ |a Spelten, Nicole
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129155
|b 22
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Troy, R. F. T.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 23
700 1 _ |a Vömel, H. V.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 24
700 1 _ |a Wagner, S. W.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 25
700 1 _ |a Wienhold, F. G. W.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 26
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)2507817-3
|p 3159-3251
|t Atmospheric measurement techniques discussions
|v 7
|y 2014
|x 1867-8610
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/155462/files/FZJ-2014-04628.pdf
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:155462
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-HGF)0
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129131
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 10
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)139077
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 22
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129155
913 2 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Marine, Küsten- und Polare Systeme
|l Atmosphäre und Klima
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-240
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-244
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Composition and dynamics of the upper troposphere and middle atmosphere
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Erde und Umwelt
|l Atmosphäre und Klima
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-230
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-234
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200
|v Composition and Dynamics of the Upper Troposphere and Stratosphere
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF2
914 1 _ |y 2014
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY3
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a No Peer Review
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0020
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
|k IEK-7
|l Stratosphäre
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-7-20101013
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-4-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21