% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Rtzer:155913,
author = {Rötzer, Kathrina and Montzka, Carsten and Bogena, Heye and
Wagner, W. and Kerr, Y. H. and Kidd, R. and Vereecken,
Harry},
title = {{C}atchment scale validation of {SMOS} and {ASCAT} soil
moisture products using hydrological modeling and temporal
stability analysis},
journal = {Journal of hydrology},
volume = {519},
number = {Part A},
issn = {0022-1694},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier},
reportid = {FZJ-2014-04843},
pages = {934 - 946},
year = {2014},
abstract = {Since soil moisture is an important influencing factor of
the hydrological cycle, knowledge of its spatio- temporal
dynamics is crucial for climate and hydrological modeling.
In recent years several soil moisture data products from
satellite information have become available with global
coverage and sub-monthly resolution. Since the remote
sensing of soil moisture is an indirect measurement method
and influenced by a large number of factors (e.g.
atmospheric correction, vegetation, soil roughness etc.), a
comprehensive validation of the resulting soil moisture
products is required. However, the coarse spatial resolution
of these products hampers the comparison with point-scale in
situ measurements. Therefore, upscaling of in situ to the
scale of the satellite data is needed. We present the
validation results of the soil moisture products of the
years 2010 to 2012 retrieved from the Soil Moisture and
Ocean Salinity (SMOS) and the Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT)
for the Rur and Erft catchments in western Germany. For the
upscaling of in situ data obtained from three test sites of
the Terrestrial Environmental Observatories (TERENO)
initiative we used the hydrological model WaSiM ETH.
Correlation of the SMOS product to modeled and upscaled soil
moisture resulted in a mean correlation coefficient of 0.28
whereas for ASCAT a correlation coefficient of 0.50 was
obtained. However, for specific regions the SMOS product
showed similar correlation coefficients as the ASCAT
product. While for ASCAT correlation was mainly dependent on
topography and vegetation, SMOS was also influenced by
radiofrequency interferences in our study area. Both
products show dry biases as compared to the soil moisture
reference. However, while SMOS showed relatively constant
bias values, ASCAT bias is variable throughout the year. As
an additional validation method we performed a temporal
stability analysis of the retrieved spatio-temporal soil
moisture data. Through investigation of mean relative
differences of soil moisture for every pixel, their standard
deviations and their rankings, we analyzed the temporal
persistence of spatial patterns. Our results show high
standard deviations for both SMOS and ASCAT soil moisture
products as compared to modeled soil moisture, indicating a
lower temporal persistence. The consistence of ranks of mean
relative differences was low for SMOS and relative ASCAT
soil moisture compared to modeled soil moisture, while ASCAT
soil moisture, converted to absolute values, showed higher
rank consistence.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {690},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {246 - Modelling and Monitoring Terrestrial Systems: Methods
and Technologies (POF2-246) / 255 - Terrestrial Systems:
From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF2-246 / G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000347589500079},
doi = {10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.07.065},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/155913},
}