% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Rascher:15617,
author = {Rascher, U. and Freiberg, M. and Lüttge, U.},
title = {{F}unctional diversity of photosynthetic light use of
sixteen vascular epiphyte species under fluctuating
irradiance in the canopy of a gianta {V}irola michelii
({M}yristicaceae) tree in the tropical lowland forest of
{F}rench {G}uyana},
journal = {Frontiers in plant science: FPLS},
volume = {2},
issn = {1664-462X},
address = {Lausanne},
publisher = {Frontiers Media},
reportid = {PreJuSER-15617},
pages = {1 - 12},
year = {2012},
note = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
abstract = {Here we present the first study, in which a large number of
different vascular epiphyte species were measured for their
photosynthetic performance in the natural environment of
their phorophyte in the lowland rainforest of French Guyana.
More than 70 epiphyte species covered the host tree in a
dense cover. Of these, the photosynthesis of 16 abundant
species was analyzed intensely over several months.
Moreover, the light environment was characterized with newly
developed light sensors that recorded continuously and with
high temporal resolution light intensity next to the
epiphytes. Light intensity was highly fluctuating and showed
great site specific spatio-temporal variations of
photosynthetic photon flux. Using a novel computer routine
we quantified the integrated light intensity the epiphytes
were exposed to in a 3 h window and we related this light
intensity to measurements of the actual photosynthetic
status. It could be shown that the photosynthetic apparatus
of the epiphytes was well adapted to the quickly changing
light conditions. Some of the epiphytes were chronically
photoinhibited at predawn and significant acute
photoinhibition, expressed by a reduction of potential
quantum efficiency (F(v)/F(m))(30'), was observed during the
day. By correlating (F(v)/F(m))(30') to the integrated and
weighted light intensity perceived during the previous
3 h, it became clear that acute photoinhibition was
related to light environment prior to the measurements.
Additionally photosynthetic performance was not determined
by rain events, with the exception of an Aechmea species.
This holds true for all the other 15 species of this study
and we thus conclude that actual photosynthesis of these
tropical epiphytes was determined by the specific and
fluctuating light conditions of their microhabitat and
cannot be simply attributed to light-adapted ancestors.},
cin = {IBG-2},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:22629271},
pmc = {pmc:PMC3355546},
UT = {WOS:000208837800013},
doi = {10.3389/fpls.2011.00117},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/15617},
}