000156271 001__ 156271
000156271 005__ 20210129214231.0
000156271 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.trpro.2014.09.081
000156271 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000366304000096
000156271 037__ $$aFZJ-2014-05062
000156271 041__ $$aEnglish
000156271 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)156196$$aZhang, J.$$b0$$eCorresponding Author$$ufzj
000156271 1112_ $$aThe Conference on Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2014$$cDelft$$d2014-10-22 - 2014-10-25$$gPED 2014$$wThe Netherlands
000156271 245__ $$aQuantitative Validation of PEDFLOW for Description of Unidirectional Pedestrian Dynamics
000156271 260__ $$c2014
000156271 29510 $$aTransportation Research Procedia
000156271 300__ $$a733–738
000156271 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)8$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aContribution to a conference proceedings$$bcontrib$$mcontrib$$s1412863308_26707
000156271 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)7$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aContribution to a book$$mcontb
000156271 3367_ $$033$$2EndNote$$aConference Paper
000156271 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aCONFERENCE_PAPER
000156271 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Conference Paper
000156271 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aconferenceObject
000156271 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aINPROCEEDINGS
000156271 520__ $$aThe results of a systematic quantitative validation of PEDFLOW based on the experimental data from FZJ are presented. Uni- directional flow experiments, totaling 28 different combinations with varying entry, corridor and exit widths, were considered. The condition imposed on PEDFLOW was that all the cases should be run with the same input parameters. The exit times and fundamental diagrams for the measuring region were evaluated and compared. This validation process led to modifications and enhancements of the model underlying PEDFLOW. The preliminary conclusions indicate that the results agree well for densities smaller than 3 m-2 and a good agreement is observed even at high densities for the corridors with bcor = 2.4 m, and bcor = 3.0 m. For densities between 1 and 2 m-2 the specific flow and velocities are underpredicted by PEDFLOW.
000156271 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-411$$a411 - Computational Science and Mathematical Methods (POF2-411)$$cPOF2-411$$fPOF II$$x0
000156271 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, juser.fz-juelich.de
000156271 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBritto, D.$$b1
000156271 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)132077$$aChraibi, M.$$b2$$ufzj
000156271 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLöhner, R.$$b3
000156271 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHaug, E.$$b4
000156271 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aGawenat, B.$$b5
000156271 773__ $$a10.1016/j.trpro.2014.09.081$$p733–738$$v2
000156271 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:156271$$pVDB
000156271 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)156196$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b0$$kFZJ
000156271 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)132077$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b2$$kFZJ
000156271 9132_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-510$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$aDE-HGF$$bPOF III$$lKey Technologies$$vSupercomputing & Big Data $$x0
000156271 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-411$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF2-410$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF2-400$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF2$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bSchlüsseltechnologien$$lSupercomputing$$vComputational Science and Mathematical Methods$$x0
000156271 9141_ $$y2014
000156271 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406$$kJSC$$lJülich Supercomputing Center$$x0
000156271 980__ $$acontrib
000156271 980__ $$aVDB
000156271 980__ $$acontb
000156271 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406
000156271 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED