000156294 001__ 156294
000156294 005__ 20210129214233.0
000156294 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1073/pnas.1216053111
000156294 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1091-6490
000156294 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0027-8424
000156294 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000341988200026
000156294 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:2690611
000156294 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:25225412
000156294 037__ $$aFZJ-2014-05085
000156294 041__ $$aEnglish
000156294 082__ $$a000
000156294 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aReich, P. B.$$b0$$eCorresponding Author
000156294 245__ $$aTemperature drives global patterns in forest biomass distribution in leaves, stems, and roots
000156294 260__ $$aWashington, DC$$bAcademy$$c2014
000156294 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1412861598_26712
000156294 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000156294 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000156294 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000156294 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000156294 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000156294 520__ $$aWhether the fraction of total forest biomass distributed in roots, stems, or leaves varies systematically across geographic gradients remains unknown despite its importance for understanding forest ecology and modeling global carbon cycles. It has been hypothesized that plants should maintain proportionally more biomass in the organ that acquires the most limiting resource. Accordingly, we hypothesize greater biomass distribution in roots and less in stems and foliage in increasingly arid climates and in colder environments at high latitudes. Such a strategy would increase uptake of soil water in dry conditions and of soil nutrients in cold soils, where they are at low supply and are less mobile. We use a large global biomass dataset (>6,200 forests from 61 countries, across a 40 °C gradient in mean annual temperature) to address these questions. Climate metrics involving temperature were better predictors of biomass partitioning than those involving moisture availability, because, surprisingly, fractional distribution of biomass to roots or foliage was unrelated to aridity. In contrast, in increasingly cold climates, the proportion of total forest biomass in roots was greater and in foliage was smaller for both angiosperm and gymnosperm forests. These findings support hypotheses about adaptive strategies of forest trees to temperature and provide biogeographically explicit relationships to improve ecosystem and earth system models. They also will allow, for the first time to our knowledge, representations of root carbon pools that consider biogeographic differences, which are useful for quantifying whole-ecosystem carbon stocks and cycles and for assessing the impact of climate change on forest carbon dynamics. 
000156294 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89582$$a89582 - Plant Science (POF2-89582)$$cPOF2-89582$$fPOF II T$$x0
000156294 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, juser.fz-juelich.de
000156294 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLuo, Y.$$b1
000156294 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBradford, J. B.$$b2
000156294 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129384$$aPoorter, H.$$b3$$ufzj
000156294 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aPerry, C. H.$$b4
000156294 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aOleksyn, J.$$b5
000156294 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1461794-8$$a10.1073/pnas.1216053111$$gVol. 111, no. 38, p. 13721 - 13726$$n38$$p13721 - 13726$$tProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America$$v111$$x1091-6490$$y2014
000156294 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:156294$$pVDB
000156294 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129384$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b3$$kFZJ
000156294 9132_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$aDE-HGF$$bPOF III$$lKey Technologies$$vKey Technologies for the Bioeconomy$$x0
000156294 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89582$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-890$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-800$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89582$$aDE-HGF$$bProgrammungebundene Forschung$$lohne Programm$$vPlant Science$$x0
000156294 9141_ $$y2014
000156294 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$2StatID$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000156294 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR
000156294 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000156294 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000156294 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000156294 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000156294 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000156294 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000156294 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000156294 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0430$$2StatID$$aNational-Konsortium
000156294 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1030$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Life Sciences
000156294 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1040$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bZoological Record
000156294 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000156294 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000156294 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118$$kIBG-2$$lPflanzenwissenschaften$$x0
000156294 980__ $$ajournal
000156294 980__ $$aVDB
000156294 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000156294 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED