% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Godman:156396,
      author       = {Godman, Marion and Jefferson, Anneli},
      title        = {{O}n {B}laming and {P}unishing {P}sychopaths},
      journal      = {Criminal law and philosophy},
      volume       = {11},
      issn         = {1871-9805},
      address      = {Dordrecht},
      publisher    = {Springer},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2014-05144},
      pages        = {127–142},
      year         = {2017},
      note         = {First Online 2014},
      abstract     = {Current legal practice holds that a diagnosis of
                      psychopathy does not remove criminal responsibility. In
                      contrast, many philosophers and legal experts are
                      increasingly persuaded by evidence from experimental
                      psychology and neuroscience indicating moral and cognitive
                      deficits in psychopaths and have argued that they should be
                      excused from moral responsibility. However, having opposite
                      views concerning psychopaths’ moral responsibility, on the
                      one hand, and criminal responsibility, on the other, seems
                      unfortunate given the assumption that the law should, at
                      least to some extent, react to the same desert-based
                      considerations as do ascriptions of moral responsibility. In
                      response, Stephen Morse has argued that the law should
                      indeed be reformed so as to excuse those with severe
                      psychopathy from blame, but that psychopaths that have
                      committed criminal offences should still be subject to some
                      legal repercussions such as civil commitment. We argue that
                      consequentialist and norm-expressivist considerations
                      analogous to those that support punishing psychopaths or at
                      least retaining some legal liability, might also be drawn on
                      in favour of holding psychopaths morally accountable.},
      cin          = {INM-8},
      ddc          = {340},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-8-20090406},
      pnm          = {472 - Key Technologies and Innovation Processes (POF2-472)
                      / 89572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF2-89572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF2-472 / G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000399340400008},
      doi          = {10.1007/s11572-014-9340-3},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/156396},
}