% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Brown:15809,
      author       = {Brown, S. and Gao, X. and Tisdelle, L. and Eickhoff, S.B.
                      and Liotti, M.},
      title        = {{N}aturalizing aesthetics: {B}rain areas for aesthetic
                      appraisal across sensory modalities},
      journal      = {NeuroImage},
      volume       = {58},
      issn         = {1053-8119},
      address      = {Orlando, Fla.},
      publisher    = {Academic Press},
      reportid     = {PreJuSER-15809},
      pages        = {250 - 258},
      year         = {2011},
      note         = {We are grateful to Ivan de Araujo and Ellen Dissanayake for
                      critical comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.
                      This work was funded by grants from the Natural Sciences and
                      Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) to SB and ML,
                      the Grammy Foundation to SB, and the Canada Foundation for
                      Innovation (CFI) to ML. SBE was supported by the Human Brain
                      Project (R01-MH074457-01A1), the Helmholtz Alliance on
                      Systems Biology (Human Brain Model), and the DFG (IRTG
                      1328).},
      abstract     = {We present here the most comprehensive analysis to date of
                      neuroaesthetic processing by reporting the results of
                      voxel-based meta-analyses of 93 neuroimaging studies of
                      positive-valence aesthetic appraisal across four sensory
                      modalities. The results demonstrate that the most concordant
                      area of activation across all four modalities is the right
                      anterior insula, an area typically associated with visceral
                      perception, especially of negative valence (disgust, pain,
                      etc.). We argue that aesthetic processing is, at its core,
                      the appraisal of the valence of perceived objects. This
                      appraisal is in no way limited to artworks but is instead
                      applicable to all types of perceived objects. Therefore, one
                      way to naturalize aesthetics is to argue that such a system
                      evolved first for the appraisal of objects of survival
                      advantage, such as food sources, and was later co-opted in
                      humans for the experience of artworks for the satisfaction
                      of social needs.},
      keywords     = {Art / Auditory Perception: physiology / Beauty / Brain:
                      physiology / Brain Mapping / Esthetics: psychology / Humans
                      / Likelihood Functions / Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Neural
                      Pathways: physiology / Positron-Emission Tomography /
                      Prefrontal Cortex: physiology / Sensation: physiology /
                      Smell: physiology / Taste: physiology / Visual Perception:
                      physiology / J (WoSType)},
      cin          = {INM-2},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-2-20090406},
      pnm          = {Funktion und Dysfunktion des Nervensystems (FUEK409) /
                      89571 - Connectivity and Activity (POF2-89571)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK409 / G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89571},
      shelfmark    = {Neurosciences / Neuroimaging / Radiology, Nuclear Medicine
                      $\&$ Medical Imaging},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:21699987},
      UT           = {WOS:000293548500027},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.012},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/15809},
}