001     15809
005     20210129210632.0
024 7 _ |2 pmid
|a pmid:21699987
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.012
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000293548500027
024 7 _ |a altmetric:258118
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-15809
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 610
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Neurosciences
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Neuroimaging
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging
100 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Brown, S.
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Naturalizing aesthetics: Brain areas for aesthetic appraisal across sensory modalities
260 _ _ |a Orlando, Fla.
|b Academic Press
|c 2011
300 _ _ |a 250 - 258
336 7 _ |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|a Journal Article
336 7 _ |2 DataCite
|a Output Types/Journal article
336 7 _ |0 0
|2 EndNote
|a Journal Article
336 7 _ |2 BibTeX
|a ARTICLE
336 7 _ |2 ORCID
|a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
336 7 _ |2 DRIVER
|a article
440 _ 0 |0 4545
|a NeuroImage
|v 58
|x 1053-8119
|y 1
500 _ _ |a We are grateful to Ivan de Araujo and Ellen Dissanayake for critical comments on an earlier version of the manuscript. This work was funded by grants from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) to SB and ML, the Grammy Foundation to SB, and the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI) to ML. SBE was supported by the Human Brain Project (R01-MH074457-01A1), the Helmholtz Alliance on Systems Biology (Human Brain Model), and the DFG (IRTG 1328).
520 _ _ |a We present here the most comprehensive analysis to date of neuroaesthetic processing by reporting the results of voxel-based meta-analyses of 93 neuroimaging studies of positive-valence aesthetic appraisal across four sensory modalities. The results demonstrate that the most concordant area of activation across all four modalities is the right anterior insula, an area typically associated with visceral perception, especially of negative valence (disgust, pain, etc.). We argue that aesthetic processing is, at its core, the appraisal of the valence of perceived objects. This appraisal is in no way limited to artworks but is instead applicable to all types of perceived objects. Therefore, one way to naturalize aesthetics is to argue that such a system evolved first for the appraisal of objects of survival advantage, such as food sources, and was later co-opted in humans for the experience of artworks for the satisfaction of social needs.
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK409
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|x 0
|c FUEK409
|a Funktion und Dysfunktion des Nervensystems (FUEK409)
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89571
|a 89571 - Connectivity and Activity (POF2-89571)
|c POF2-89571
|f POF II T
|x 1
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Art
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Auditory Perception: physiology
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Beauty
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Brain: physiology
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Brain Mapping
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Esthetics: psychology
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Humans
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Likelihood Functions
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Magnetic Resonance Imaging
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Neural Pathways: physiology
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Positron-Emission Tomography
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Prefrontal Cortex: physiology
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Sensation: physiology
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Smell: physiology
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Taste: physiology
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Visual Perception: physiology
650 _ 7 |2 WoSType
|a J
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Aesthetics
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Arts
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Neuroaesthetics
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Brain
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a fMRI
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Meta-analysis
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a ALE
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Orbitofrontal
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Anterior insula
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Anterior cingulate
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Pleasure
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Valence
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Pleasantness
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Hedonics
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Music
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Preference
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Visceral
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Interoceptive
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Exteroceptive
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Gao, X.
|b 1
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Tisdelle, L.
|b 2
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)131678
|a Eickhoff, S.B.
|b 3
|u FZJ
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Liotti, M.
|b 4
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)1471418-8
|a 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.012
|g Vol. 58, p. 250 - 258
|p 250 - 258
|q 58<250 - 258
|t NeuroImage
|v 58
|x 1053-8119
|y 2011
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.012
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:15809
|p VDB
913 2 _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-571
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|v Connectivity and Activity
|x 0
913 1 _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89571
|a DE-HGF
|v Connectivity and Activity
|x 1
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-890
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-800
|b Programmungebundene Forschung
|l ohne Programm
914 1 _ |y 2011
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|a JCR/ISI refereed
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-2-20090406
|g INM
|k INM-2
|l Molekulare Organisation des Gehirns
|x 0
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)129126
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-2-20090406
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21