% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Rosenbaum:15979,
author = {Rosenbaum, U. and Huisman, J.A. and Vrba, J. and Vereecken,
H. and Bogena, H.R.},
title = {{C}orrection of {T}emperature and {E}lectrical
{C}onductivity {E}ffects on {D}ielectric {P}ermittivity
{M}easurements with {ECH}(2){O} {S}ensors},
journal = {Vadose zone journal},
volume = {10},
issn = {1539-1663},
address = {Madison, Wis.},
publisher = {SSSA},
reportid = {PreJuSER-15979},
pages = {582 - 593},
year = {2011},
note = {We gratefully acknowledge the support of the SFB 32
"Pattern in Soil-Vegetation-Atmosphere Systems: Monitoring,
Modelling and Data Assimilation" funded by the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and by TERENO "Terrestrial
Environmental Observatories" funded by the Federal Ministry
of Education and Research (BMBF). We gratefully thank Prof.
R.H. Jansen (Chair of Electromagnetic Theory, RWTH Aachen
University) for help with the network analyzer measurements;
A. Weuthen and J. Holtkemeier (Forschungszentrum Juelich),
A. Kunoth (Institute for Mathematics, University of
Paderborn, Germany), Nirca Gerl, and Anne Lange are thanked
for their assistance.},
abstract = {The measurement accuracy of low-cost electromagnetic soil
water content sensors is often deteriorated by temperature
and soil bulk electrical conductivity effects. This study
aimed to quantify these effects for the ECH2O EC-5 and 5TE
sensors and to derive and test correction functions. In a
first experiment, the temperature of eight reference liquids
with permittivity ranging from 7 to 42 was varied from 5 to
40 degrees C. Both sensor types showed an underestimation of
permittivity for low temperature (5-25 degrees C) and an
overestimation for high temperature (25-40 degrees C). Next,
NaCl was added to increase the conductivity of the reference
liquids (up to similar to 2.5 dS m(-1) for a permittivity of
26-42, up to similar to 1.5 dS m(-1) for a permittivity of
22-26). The permittivity measured with both sensors showed a
strong and complicated dependence on electrical
conductivity, with both under-and overestimation of
permittivity. Using these experimental data, we derived
empirical correction functions. The performance of the
correction functions for the 5TE sensor was evaluated using
coarse sand and silty clay loam soil samples. After
correcting for temperature effects, the measured
permittivity corresponded well with theoretical predictions
from a dielectric mixing model for soil with low electrical
conductivity. The conductivity correction function also
improved the accuracy of the soil moisture measurements, but
only within the validity range of this function. Finally,
both temperature and electrical conductivity of the silty
clay loam were varied and a sequential application of both
correction functions also resulted in permittivity
measurements that corresponded well with model predictions.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Environmental Sciences / Soil Science / Water Resources},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000291396000011},
doi = {10.2136/vzj2010.0083},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/15979},
}