% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Mboh:15981,
author = {Mboh, C.M. and Huisman, J.A. and Vereecken, H.},
title = {{F}easibility of {S}equential and {C}oupled {I}nversion of
{T}ime {D}omain {R}eflectometry {D}ata to {I}nfer {S}oil
{H}ydraulic {P}arameters under {F}alling {H}ead
{I}nfiltration},
journal = {Soil Science Society of America journal},
volume = {75},
number = {3},
issn = {0361-5995},
address = {Madison, Wis.},
publisher = {SSSA},
reportid = {PreJuSER-15981},
pages = {775 - 786},
year = {2011},
note = {C.M. Mboh and J.A. Huisman are supported by grant
HU1312/2-1 and HU1312/2-2 of the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft.},
abstract = {Accurate estimation of soil hydraulic properties is a
prerequisite for efficient soil and water management. On a
small scale, time domain reflectometry (TDR) measurements
obtained during an infiltration event can be used for
estimating soil hydraulic properties either using a
sequential or a coupled inversion approach. In the
traditional sequential approach, the TDR measurements are
inverted into water content averages based on travel time
analysis and subsequently used for calibrating a hydrologic
model. Travel time analysis has been reported to be
subjective and difficult to use for analyzing TDR
measurements obtained during infiltration. In this paper, we
extend the sequential inversion approach by using water
content profiles (WCPs) obtained via inverse modeling of TDR
measurements and introduce a coupled inversion approach
which directly uses the TDR measurements for constraining
the inversion for hydraulic properties without first
inverting them into WCPs or averages. By comparing the
feasibility of these approaches to infer three Mualem-van
Genuchten (MVG) hydraulic parameters (alpha, n, K-s) from
TDR measurements obtained under falling head infiltration,
we concluded that the coupled approach is more practical and
less uncertain than the sequential approach. In particular,
the coupled inversion approach allows to simultaneously
monitor ponding depth and water infiltration, which avoids
the laborious task of manually measuring the ponding depths
and can thus enable rapid estimation of the soil hydraulic
parameters for multiple locations through automatic
measurements of ponded infiltration for multiple rings
through TDR multiplexing.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Soil Science},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000290856500002},
doi = {10.2136/sssaj2010.0285},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/15981},
}