000016210 001__ 16210
000016210 005__ 20210129210643.0
000016210 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.3934/nhm.2011.6.545
000016210 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000294891900010
000016210 037__ $$aPreJuSER-16210
000016210 041__ $$aeng
000016210 082__ $$a510
000016210 084__ $$2WoS$$aMathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications
000016210 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aSchadschneider, A.$$b0
000016210 245__ $$aEmpirical results for pedestrian dynamics and their implications for modeling
000016210 260__ $$aSpringfield, Mo.$$bAIMS$$c2011
000016210 300__ $$a545 - 560
000016210 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000016210 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000016210 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000016210 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000016210 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000016210 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000016210 440_0 $$024401$$aNetworks and Heterogeneous Media$$v6$$y3
000016210 500__ $$aPart of this work has been performed within the research program HERMES supported by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research - BMBF (FKZ 13N9952 and 13N9960).
000016210 520__ $$aThe current status of empirical results for pedestrian dynamics is reviewd. Suprisingly even for basic quantities like the flow-density relation there is currently no consensus since the results obtained in various empirical and experimental studies deviate substantially. We report results from recent large-scale experiments for pedestrian flow in simple scenarios like long corridors and bottlenecks which have been performed under controlled laboratory conditions that are easily reproducible. Finally the implications of the unsatisfactory empirical situation for the modeling of pedestrian dynamics is discussed.
000016210 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK411$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aScientific Computing (FUEK411)$$cFUEK411$$x0
000016210 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-411$$a411 - Computational Science and Mathematical Methods (POF2-411)$$cPOF2-411$$fPOF II$$x1
000016210 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science
000016210 65320 $$2Author$$aPedestrian dynamics
000016210 65320 $$2Author$$afundamental diagram
000016210 65320 $$2Author$$abottleneck
000016210 65320 $$2Author$$astatistical analysis
000016210 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000016210 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)132266$$aSeyfried, A.$$b1$$uFZJ
000016210 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2387587-2$$a10.3934/nhm.2011.6.545$$gVol. 6, p. 545 - 560$$p545 - 560$$q6<545 - 560$$tNetworks and heterogeneous media$$v6$$x1556-1801$$y2011
000016210 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3934/nhm.2011.6.545
000016210 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:16210$$pVDB
000016210 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0040$$2StatID$$aPeer review unknown
000016210 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR
000016210 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000016210 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000016210 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000016210 9141_ $$y2011
000016210 9132_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-510$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lSupercomputing & Big Data$$vComputational Science and Mathematical Methods$$x0
000016210 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-411$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF2-410$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF2-400$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF2$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bSchlüsseltechnologien$$lSupercomputing$$vComputational Science and Mathematical Methods$$x3
000016210 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406$$gJSC$$kJSC$$lJülich Supercomputing Centre$$x0
000016210 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)129963
000016210 980__ $$aVDB
000016210 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000016210 980__ $$ajournal
000016210 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406
000016210 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED