% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Jadoon:16235,
author = {Jadoon, K.Z. and Lambot, S. and Scharnagl, B. and van der
Kruk, J. and Slob, E. and Vereecken, H.},
title = {{Q}uantifying field-scale surface soil water content from
proximal {GPR} signal inversion in the time domain},
journal = {Near surface geophysics},
volume = {8},
issn = {1569-4445},
address = {Houten},
publisher = {EAGE},
reportid = {PreJuSER-16235},
pages = {483 - 491},
year = {2010},
note = {We thank R. Harms and L. Weihermuller for their assistance
with the antenna calibration and field measurements. This
work was supported by Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH,
Germany, Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS)
and Universite Catholique de Louvain, Belgium, Delft
University of Technology, the Netherlands and the DIGISOIL
project, financed by the European Commission under the
7<SUP>th</SUP> Framework Programme for Research and
Technological Development, Area 'Environment', Activity 6.3
'Environmental Technologies'.},
abstract = {We applied inverse modelling of zero-offset, air-raised
ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data to measure soil surface
water contents over a bare agricultural. field. The GPR
system consisted of a vector network analyser combined with
a low-frequency 0.2-2.0 GHz off-ground monostatic horn
antenna, thereby setting up an ultra-wideband
stepped-frequency continuous-wave radar. A fully automated
platform was created by mounting the radar system on a truck
for real-time data acquisition. An antenna calibration
experiment was performed by lifting the whole setup to
different heights above a perfect electrical conductor. This
calibration procedure allowed the flittering out of the
antenna effects and antenna-soil interactions from the raw
radar data in the frequency domain. To avoid surface
roughness effects, only the lower frequency range of 0.2-0.8
GHz was used for signal processing. Inversions of the radar
data using the Green's functions were performed in the time
domain, focusing on a time window containing the surface
reflection. GPR measurements were conducted every 4 m along
a transect of 100 m. In addition, five time-domain
reflectometry measurements were randomly recorded within the
footprint of the GPR antenna. A good agreement was observed
between the GPR and time-domain reflectometry soil water
content estimates, as compared to the previous study
performed at the same test site using a higher frequency
0.8-1.6 GHz horn antenna. To monitor the dynamics of soil
water content, a pair of time-domain reflectometry probes
was installed at 8 cm depth near the footprint of the GPR
antenna and both time-domain reflectometry and GPR
measurements were carried out for a period of 20 days. A
good agreement of the trend was observed between the
time-domain reflectometry and GPR time-lapse data with
respect to several precipitation events. The proposed method
and truck-mounted setup appear to be promising for the
real-time mapping and monitoring of surface soil moisture
contents at the field scale.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {Terrestrische Umwelt},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407},
shelfmark = {Geochemistry $\&$ Geophysics},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000285399200007},
doi = {10.3997/1873-0604.2010036},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/16235},
}