001     1652
005     20200423202404.0
024 7 _ |2 pmid
|a pmid:19302172
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01969.x
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000266601600012
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-1652
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 570
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Plant Sciences
100 1 _ |a Schmidt, L.
|b 0
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB68283
245 _ _ |a Local and systemic effects of two herbivores with different feeding mechanisms on primary metabolism of cotton leaves
260 _ _ |a Oxford [u.a.]
|b Wiley-Blackwell
|c 2009
300 _ _ |a 893 - 903
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |a Plant, Cell and Environment
|x 0140-7791
|0 4976
|y 7
|v 32
500 _ _ |a Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012
520 _ _ |a Caterpillars and spider mites are herbivores with different feeding mechanisms. Spider mites feed on the cell content via stylets, while caterpillars, as chewing herbivores, remove larger amounts of photosynthetically active tissue. We investigated local and systemic effects of short-term caterpillar and spider mite herbivory on cotton in terms of primary metabolism and growth processes. After short-term caterpillar feeding, leaf growth and water content were decreased in damaged leaves. The glutamate/glutamine ratio increased and other free amino acids were also affected. In contrast, mild spider mite infestation did not affect leaf growth or amino acid composition, but led to an increase in total nitrogen and sucrose concentrations. Both herbivores induced locally increased dark respiration, suggesting an increased mobilization of storage compounds potentially available for synthesis of defensive substances, but did not affect assimilation and transpiration. Systemically induced leaves were not significantly affected by the treatments performed in this study. The results show that cotton plants do not compensate the loss of photosynthetic tissue with higher photosynthetic efficiency of the remaining tissue. However, early plant responses to different herbivores leave their signature in primary metabolism, affecting leaf growth. Changes in amino acid concentrations, total nitrogen and sucrose content may affect subsequent herbivore performance.
536 _ _ |a Terrestrische Umwelt
|c P24
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Animals
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Feeding Behavior
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Glutamic Acid: metabolism
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Glutamine: metabolism
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Gossypium: growth & development
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Gossypium: metabolism
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Larva: physiology
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Nitrogen: metabolism
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Photosynthesis
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Plant Leaves: growth & development
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Plant Leaves: metabolism
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Species Specificity
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Spodoptera: physiology
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Sucrose: metabolism
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Tetranychidae: physiology
650 _ 7 |0 56-85-9
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a Glutamine
650 _ 7 |0 56-86-0
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a Glutamic Acid
650 _ 7 |0 57-50-1
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a Sucrose
650 _ 7 |0 7727-37-9
|2 NLM Chemicals
|a Nitrogen
650 _ 7 |a J
|2 WoSType
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Gossypium hirsutum
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Spodoptera littoralis
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Tetranychus urticae
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a amino acids
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a herbivory
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a leaf growth
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a nitrogen
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a photosynthesis
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a starch
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a sucrose
700 1 _ |a Schurr, U.
|b 1
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129402
700 1 _ |a Röse, U.S.R.
|b 2
|u FZJ
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB64337
773 _ _ |a 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01969.x
|g Vol. 32, p. 893 - 903
|p 893 - 903
|q 32<893 - 903
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2020843-1
|t Plant, cell & environment
|v 32
|y 2009
|x 0140-7791
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.01969.x
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/1652/files/FZJ-1652.pdf
|z Published final document.
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:1652
|p VDB
913 1 _ |k P24
|v Terrestrische Umwelt
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|b Erde und Umwelt
|0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2009
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|a JCR/ISI refereed
920 1 _ |k ICG-3
|l Phytosphäre
|d 31.10.2010
|g ICG
|0 I:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406
|x 1
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)103200
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICG-3-20090406


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21