001     16792
005     20200702121602.0
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.08.032
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000296601600032
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-16792
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 690
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Engineering, Civil
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Geosciences, Multidisciplinary
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Water Resources
100 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB95614
|a Jonard, F.
|b 0
|u FZJ
245 _ _ |a Sap flux density and stomatal conductance of European beech and common oak trees in pure and mixed stands during the summer drought of 2003
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|b Elsevier
|c 2011
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |0 3413
|a Journal of Hydrology
|v 409
|x 0022-1694
|y 1
500 _ _ |3 POF3_Assignment on 2016-02-29
500 _ _ |a This research was funded by the European Commission and the Walloon Region (DGARNE/DNF) in the framework of the EU regulation 1091/94 on the protection of forests against atmospheric pollution. We thank J. Morren for his technical and material assistance, and F. Hardy and F. Plume for their intensive help with field measurements. Finally, we wish to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions that significantly improved the manuscript.
520 _ _ |a Sap flux density of European beech and common oak trees was determined from sap flow measurements in pure and mixed stands during the summer drought of 2003. Eight trees per species and per stand were equipped with sap flow sensors. Soil water content was monitored in each stand at different depths by using time-domain reflectometry (TDR). Leaf area index and vertical root distribution were also investigated during the growing season. From sap flux density (SFD) data, mean stomatal conductance of individual trees (G(s)) was calculated by inverting the Penman-Monteith equation. Linear mixed models were developed to analyse the effects of species and stand type (pure vs. mixed) on SFD and G(s) and on their sensitivity to environmental variables (vapour pressure deficit (D), incoming solar radiation (R-G), and relative extractable water (REW)). For reference environmental conditions, we did not find any tree species or stand type effects on SFD. The sensitivity of SFD to D was higher for oak than for beech in the pure stands (P < 0.0001) but the mixing of species reduced it for oak and increased it for beech, so that the sensitivity of SFD to D became higher for beech than for oak in the mixed stand (P < 0.0001). At reference conditions, G(s) was significantly higher for beech compared to oak (2.1 and 1.8 times in the pure and mixed stand, respectively). This was explained by a larger beech sapwood-to-leaf area ratio compared to oak. The sensitivity of G(s) to REW was higher for beech than for oak and was ascribed to a higher vulnerability of beech to air embolism and to a more sensitive stomatal regulation. The sensitivity of beech G(s) to REW was lower in the mixed than in the pure stand, which could be explained by a better sharing of the resources in the mixture, by facilitation processes (hydraulic lift), and by a rainfall partitioning in favour of beech. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|a Terrestrische Umwelt
|c P24
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science
650 _ 7 |2 WoSType
|a J
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Sap flux
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Stomatal conductance
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Tree species mixture
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Drought
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Fagus sylvatica
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a Quercus petraea
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB85547
|a André, F.
|b 1
|u FZJ
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Ponette, Q.
|b 2
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Vincke, C.
|b 3
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Jonard, M.
|b 4
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)1473173-3
|a 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.08.032
|g Vol. 409
|q 409
|t Journal of hydrology
|v 409
|x 0022-1694
|y 2011
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.08.032
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:16792
|p VDB
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
913 1 _ |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|a DE-HGF
|b Erde und Umwelt
|k P24
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|v Terrestrische Umwelt
|x 0
913 2 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Marine, Küsten- und Polare Systeme
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-259H
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Addenda
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2011
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|a JCR/ISI refereed
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|g IBG
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)131041
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21