% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Dippel:16901,
      author       = {Dippel, A.-C. and Schneller, T. and Dornseiffer, J. and
                      Waser, R.},
      title        = {{P}b{T}i{O}3 nanoparticle precursors for chemical solution
                      deposited electroceramic thin films},
      journal      = {Journal of sol gel science and technology},
      volume       = {57},
      issn         = {0928-0707},
      address      = {Dordrecht [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Springer Science + Business Media B.V},
      reportid     = {PreJuSER-16901},
      pages        = {36 - 42},
      year         = {2011},
      note         = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
      abstract     = {The Vascular Registry (VR) on carotid procedures collects
                      long-term outcomes on carotid artery stenting (CAS) and
                      carotid endarterectomy (CEA) patients. The purpose of this
                      report is to describe in-hospital and 30-day CAS outcomes in
                      patients with atherosclerotic carotid artery disease (CAD;
                      atherosclerosis [ATH]) compared to recurrent carotid
                      stenosis (RES) and radiation-induced stenosis (RAD).The VR
                      collects provider-reported data on CAS using a Web-based
                      data management system. For this report, data were analyzed
                      at the preprocedure, procedure, predischarge, and 30-day
                      intervals.As of November 20, 2008, there were 4017 patients
                      with CAS with discharge data, of which $72\%$ were due to
                      ATH. A total of 2321 patients were available for 30-day
                      outcomes analysis (1623 ATH, 529 restenosis, 119 radiation,
                      17 dissection, 3 trauma, and 30 other). Baseline
                      demographics showed that ATH occurred in older patients
                      (72-years-old), had the greatest history of coronary artery
                      disease (CAD; $62\%),$ myocardial infarction (MI; $24\%),$
                      valvular heart disease $(8\%),$ arrhythmia $(16\%),$
                      congestive heart failure (CHF; $16\%),$ diabetes mellitus
                      (DM; $35\%),$ and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
                      (COPD; $20\%).$ RES had a higher degree of baseline stenosis
                      (87.0 vs 85.8 ATH; P = .010), were less likely to be
                      symptomatic $(35.5\%$ vs $46.3\%$ ATH; P < .001), but had a
                      greater history of hypertension, peripheral vascular disease
                      (PVD), and smoking. RAD was seen in younger patients (66.6
                      vs 71.7 ATH; P < .001), were more likely to be male
                      $(78.2\%$ vs $60.9\%$ ATH; P < .001), and had less
                      comorbidities overall, with the exception of amaurosis
                      fugax, smoking, and cancer. The only statistically
                      significant difference in perioperative rates was in
                      transient ischemic attack (TIA; $2.7\%$ ATH vs $0.9\%$ RES;
                      P = .02). There were no statistically significant
                      differences in in-hospital death/stroke/MI (ATH $5.4\%,$ RES
                      $3.8\%,$ RAD $4.2\%)$ or at 30 days (ATH $7.1\%,$ RES
                      $5.1\%,$ RAD $5.0\%).$ Even after adjusting for age, gender,
                      symptomatology, CHF, and renal failure, the only
                      statistically significant difference at 30 days was
                      amaurosis fugax between ATH and RAD (odds ratio [OR] 0.13; P
                      = .01).Although patients with ATH have statistically
                      significant comorbidities, they did not have statistically
                      significant increased rates of death/stroke/MI during
                      hospitalization or within 30 days after discharge when
                      compared to RES or RAD. The CAS event rates for ATH vs RES
                      and RAD are similar, despite prior published reports.
                      Symptomatic ATH have statistically significant higher rates
                      of death/stroke/MI compared to asymptomatic cohort. Finally,
                      consistent and accurate entry of long-term data beyond
                      initial hospitalization is essential to fully assess CAS
                      outcomes since a significant number of adverse events occur
                      in the interval from hospital discharge to 30 days.},
      keywords     = {Aged / Aged, 80 and over / Analysis of Variance /
                      Angioplasty: instrumentation / Angioplasty: methods /
                      Angioplasty: mortality / Atherosclerosis: pathology /
                      Atherosclerosis: surgery / Atherosclerosis: ultrasonography
                      / Carotid Stenosis: mortality / Carotid Stenosis: pathology
                      / Carotid Stenosis: surgery / Carotid Stenosis:
                      ultrasonography / Cohort Studies / Endarterectomy, Carotid:
                      adverse effects / Endarterectomy, Carotid: methods / Female
                      / Hospital Mortality: trends / Humans / Male / Middle Aged /
                      Odds Ratio / Postoperative Complications: epidemiology /
                      Postoperative Complications: physiopathology / Probability /
                      Prosthesis Failure / Registries / Risk Assessment / Severity
                      of Illness Index / Societies, Medical / Stents / Survival
                      Analysis / Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex / J (WoSType)},
      cin          = {IEK-8 / PGI-7 / JARA-FIT},
      ddc          = {600},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013 / I:(DE-Juel1)PGI-7-20110106 /
                      $I:(DE-82)080009_20140620$},
      pnm          = {Atmosphäre und Klima / Grundlagen für zukünftige
                      Informationstechnologien},
      pid          = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK491 / G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK412},
      shelfmark    = {Materials Science, Ceramics},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:20347551},
      UT           = {WOS:000285974700008},
      doi          = {10.1007/s10971-010-2321-7},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/16901},
}