000171894 001__ 171894
000171894 005__ 20220930130034.0
000171894 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1016/j.fcr.2014.05.009
000171894 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0378-4290
000171894 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1872-6852
000171894 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000340699500013
000171894 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:21824200
000171894 037__ $$aFZJ-2014-05450
000171894 082__ $$a630
000171894 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aLeitner, Daniel$$b0$$eCorresponding Author
000171894 245__ $$aImpact of contrasted maize root traits at flowering on water stress tolerance – A simulation study
000171894 260__ $$aAmsterdam$$bElsevier$$c2014
000171894 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1414671106_6543
000171894 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000171894 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000171894 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000171894 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000171894 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000171894 520__ $$aWater stress is among the dominant yield limiting factors in global crop production. Better drought resistance is therefore a key challenge for breeding and crop management. Avoidance of water stress by effective root water uptake is considered a promising approach to yield stability in water limiting environments. Water uptake efficiency is the result of multiple plant root traits that dynamically interact with site hydrology. Root models are therefore an essential tool to identify key root traits for water efficient crops in a certain target cropping environment.We present a novel combination of a dynamic root architecture model (RootBox) with a functional model of root xylem hydraulic properties and soil water flow (R-SWMS). This model integrates structural and functional root traits to simulate water uptake under variable hydrological conditions. Application of the model is exemplified for three different maize root phenotypes. We evaluate the role of root architectural and functional traits to deal with water stress at the flowering stage under two contrasted hydrological conditions (deep water storage vs. moist upper profile layer in silt loam) for a 7-day period. The phenotypes include a reference phenotype (P1), one phenotype with steeper main roots (P2), and one with steep main roots and with longer lateral roots (P3) We showed that generally those phenotypes whose root axes allocation matched with available water distribution were able to transpire more. This synchronization is a result of root architecture (structural root traits). The temporal dynamics of water depletion on the contrary were essentially determined by root hydraulic properties. We showed that lower equivalent root conductance is essentially related to a water saving behaviour of the plant, while high root conductance contributes to a water spending type with high initial transpiration that decreases quickly over time.). We also showed the dramatic importance of root hydraulic property distribution, and their relation to root order and root age, in determining equivalent root conductance and water uptake behaviour. In our simulations, increasing the radial conductivity of lateral roots by a factor 10 had more impact in the total transpiration than having different root architecture traits. It emphasizes the importance to consider not only architectural traits but also hydraulic properties in defining ideotypes and to use quantitative methods to build and test them.Our results confirmed that functional-structural root models are appropriate to better understand the role of roots in whole plant adaptation to different drought scenarios and their contribution to distinct drought response types. The newly developed model contains all basic components to further refine complex root processes such as architectural plasticity, dynamic root conductance (xylem vulnerability, composite radial transport) and root exudation. These results could feed into cropping system models to see the effect of these processes on crop yield.
000171894 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-246$$a246 - Modelling and Monitoring Terrestrial Systems: Methods and Technologies (POF2-246)$$cPOF2-246$$fPOF II$$x0
000171894 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$a255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)$$cPOF3-255$$fPOF III$$x1
000171894 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, juser.fz-juelich.de
000171894 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMeunier, Félicien$$b1
000171894 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBodner, Gernot$$b2
000171894 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129477$$aJavaux, Mathieu$$b3$$ufzj
000171894 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)157922$$aSchnepf, Andrea$$b4$$ufzj
000171894 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2012484-3$$a10.1016/j.fcr.2014.05.009$$gVol. 165, p. 125 - 137$$p125 - 137$$tField crops research$$v165$$x0378-4290$$y2014
000171894 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/171894/files/FZJ-2014-05450.pdf$$yRestricted
000171894 8767_ $$92014-07-01$$d2015-09-24$$eHybrid-OA$$jZahlung erfolgt$$zGesamtkosten (€ 1851,17) geteilt durch vier Institutionen. FZJ hat ihreTeilzahlung versäumt.
000171894 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:171894$$pVDB:Earth_Environment$$pVDB$$pOpenAPC$$popenCost
000171894 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR
000171894 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000171894 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000171894 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000171894 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000171894 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000171894 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000171894 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000171894 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000171894 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000171894 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF <  5
000171894 9141_ $$y2014
000171894 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129477$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b3$$kFZJ
000171894 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)157922$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b4$$kFZJ
000171894 9132_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$aDE-HGF$$bPOF III$$lMarine, Küsten- und Polare Systeme$$vTerrestrische Umwelt$$x0
000171894 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-246$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF2-240$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF2$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vModelling and Monitoring Terrestrial Systems: Methods and Technologies$$x0
000171894 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$9G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255$$aDE-HGF$$bErde und Umwelt$$lTerrestrische Umwelt$$vTerrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction$$x1
000171894 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118$$kIBG-3$$lAgrosphäre$$x0
000171894 980__ $$ajournal
000171894 980__ $$aVDB
000171894 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
000171894 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000171894 980__ $$aAPC