001     172066
005     20210129214351.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.still.2014.07.016
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0167-1987
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1879-3444
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a WOS:000341902400019
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2014-05610
082 _ _ |a 630
100 1 _ |a Borchard, Nils
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)145704
|b 0
|e Corresponding Author
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a Application of biochars to sandy and silty soil failed to increase maize yield under common agricultural practice
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2014
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1415173676_23055
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
520 _ _ |a Adding biochar to tropical soils is a strategy for improving crop yield and mitigating climate change, but how various biochar types affect crop yield and the properties of temperate soils is still in dispute. Here, we evaluated how slow-pyrolysis charcoal and two biochars derived from energy production (gasification coke and flash-pyrolysis char) affected the growth of Zea mays L. and the related properties of sandy and silty soils within a 3-year mesocosm experiment. Fertilization was performed to optimize plant growth as would be done under common agricultural practice. Analyses included the monitoring of yield, plant and soil nutrients, aggregate stability, cation exchange and water holding capacity, and black carbon content. The results showed that the added biochars did not affect crop yield at an application rate of 15 g biochar kg−1 of soil. Increasing the application rate of slow-pyrolysis charcoal to 100 g kg−1 resulted in decreased plant biomass in the second and third year of the experiment, likely as a result of nutrient imbalances and N-immobilization. We did not detect any degradation of the added black carbon; however, beneficial effects on plants were limited by the small and transient effect of these biochars on the physical and chemical properties of soil. Overall, our results indicate that the added carbon from biochars is stored in soil, but all treatments tested failed to improve plant yield for the studied temperate soils under the given application rates and common agricultural practice.
536 _ _ |a 245 - Chemicals in the Environment (POF2-245)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-245
|c POF2-245
|f POF II
|x 0
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|f POF III
|x 1
|c POF3-255
|a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Siemens, Jan
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Ladd, Brenton
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 2
700 1 _ |a Möller, Andreas
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Amelung, Wulf
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)129427
|b 4
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.still.2014.07.016
|g Vol. 144, p. 184 - 194
|0 PERI:(DE-600)1498737-5
|p 184 - 194
|t Soil & tillage research
|v 144
|y 2014
|x 0167-1987
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/172066/files/FZJ-2014-05610.pdf
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:172066
|p VDB
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)145704
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129427
913 2 _ |a DE-HGF
|b POF III
|l Marine, Küsten- und Polare Systeme
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Terrestrische Umwelt
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Erde und Umwelt
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-240
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-245
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200
|v Chemicals in the Environment
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF2
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|9 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|x 1
|v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|b Erde und Umwelt
914 1 _ |y 2014
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a Nationallizenz
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
|k IBG-3
|l Agrosphäre
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21