% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Borchard:172067,
author = {Borchard, Nils and Ladd, Brenton and Eschemann, Sita and
Hegenberg, Dominik and Möseler, Bodo Maria and Amelung,
Wulf},
title = {{B}lack carbon and soil properties at historical charcoal
production sites in {G}ermany},
journal = {Geoderma},
volume = {232-234},
issn = {0016-7061},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {FZJ-2014-05611},
pages = {236 - 242},
year = {2014},
abstract = {The use of charcoal as a soil amendment is currently of
great interest to sequester carbon and improve soil
fertility, however, studies of sites where charcoal
amendments to the soil have been made many years ago are
lacking at the moment. In this study we investigated
historical charcoal production sites in Germany that have
not been in use for > 60 years, and evaluated the effects of
the former charcoal inputs on soil and vegetation parameters
relative to those of adjacent, unamended areas. Surface soil
samples (0–5, 5–20 cm) were taken from five sites
located on extremely acidic (Siegerland, pH 3.8–4.1) and
base rich soils (Eifel, pH 4.8–5.3) in species poor
(Luzulo-Fagetum) and species rich (Hordelymo-Fagetum) beech
forests, respectively. We determined stocks of black carbon
(BC) and natural soil organic carbon (SOC = total C minus
BC) as well as of soil nutrient stocks (NO3-N, P, K, Mg),
cation exchange capacity and water holding capacity, and we
mapped plant composition to calculate richness and evenness.
The results showed that historical charcoal production sites
were enriched with BC and also exhibited increased stocks of
natural SOC and total N possibly due to enhanced
stabilization of natural SOC by the charcoal. The
availability of nitrate-nitrogen, phosphate and potassium
was increased when the charcoal was added to the base rich
soils and less so when charcoal was added to the extremely
acidic soils. Plant biodiversity was not different between
the sites of historical charcoal addition and the reference
sites. We conclude that charcoal additions may increase soil
carbon storage capacity over prolonged periods of time
without negatively affecting plant ecological interactions
over the long term.},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {246 - Modelling and Monitoring Terrestrial Systems: Methods
and Technologies (POF2-246) / 255 - Terrestrial Systems:
From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF2-246 / G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000340315700024},
doi = {10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.05.007},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/172067},
}