% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Fuentes:172073,
      author       = {Fuentes, Bárbara and Mora, María de la Luz and Bol,
                      Roland and San Martin, Francisca and Pérez, Elizabeth and
                      Cartes, Paula},
      title        = {{S}orption of inositol hexaphosphate on desert soils},
      journal      = {Geoderma},
      volume       = {232-234},
      issn         = {0016-7061},
      address      = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier Science},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2014-05617},
      pages        = {573 - 580},
      year         = {2014},
      abstract     = {Sorption of inositol hexaphosphate (IP6) on desert soils
                      was studied to evaluate their use as a novel low-cost
                      sorbent material for organic P removal in water treatment.
                      The kinetics of IP6 sorption, pH effects, and sorption
                      isotherms were examined in batch experiments on four desert
                      saline–sodic soils: Antofagasta (AN), Mejillones (ME),
                      Aguas Blancas I (ABI), and Aguas Blancas II (ABII). The
                      sorption kinetics of inositol hexaphosphate expressed as P
                      (P-IP6) on these soils were described by the Elovich
                      equation and the initial sorption velocities ranked in the
                      order: ABII > ABI > ME > AN. In addition, P-IP6 sorption
                      capacity in AN, ME, and ABI was strongly influenced by the
                      solution pH, but in ABII it was not pH-dependent. Whereas
                      the experimental data of P-IP6 sorption on ME, ABI, and ABII
                      were better fitted by the Langmuir equation (implying a
                      homogenous distribution of active sorption sites), for AN
                      the best fit was obtained with the Freundlich model
                      (implying heterogeneous, multi-layered sorption surfaces).
                      The maximum P-IP6 sorption capacities ranked: ABII > ME > AN
                      > ABI. Based on the results of our study, ABII soil is
                      recommended for P-IP6 removal. In this soil, P-IP6 sorption
                      did not depend on solution pH, and the precipitation and
                      sorption of IP6 were associated with Ca2 +, Mg2 +, and
                      minerals such as montmorillonite and vermiculite.},
      cin          = {IBG-3},
      ddc          = {550},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
      pnm          = {246 - Modelling and Monitoring Terrestrial Systems: Methods
                      and Technologies (POF2-246) / 255 - Terrestrial Systems:
                      From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF2-246 / G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000340315700055},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.06.016},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/172073},
}