% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@INPROCEEDINGS{Mehmood:172404,
author = {Mehmood, Khalid and Hofmann, Diana and Burauel, Peter and
Vereecken, Harry and Berns, Anne E.},
title = {{C}esium and strontium sorption behavior in amended
agricultural soils},
journal = {Geophysical research abstracts},
volume = {16},
issn = {1607-7962},
address = {Katlenburg-Lindau},
publisher = {Soc.},
reportid = {FZJ-2014-05884},
pages = {875},
year = {2014},
abstract = {Biogas digestates and biochar are emerging soil amendments.
Biochar is a byproduct of pyrolysis process which isthermal
decomposition of biomass to produce syngas and bio-oil. The
use of biochar for soil amendment is beingpromoted for
higher crop yields and carbon sequestration. Currently, the
numbers of biogas plants in Germany areincreasing to meet
the new energy scenarios. The sustainability of biogas
industry requires proper disposal optionsfor digestate.
Biogas digestates being rich in nutrients are beneficial to
enhance agricultural productions. Contraryto the agronomical
benefits of these organic amendments, their use can
influence the mobility and bioavailabilityof soil
contaminants due to nutrients competition and high organic
matter content. So far, the impact of suchamendments on
highly problematic contaminants like radionuclides is not
truly accounted for.In the present study,
sorption-desorption behavior of cesium and strontium was
investigated in three soilsof different origin and texture.
Two agricultural soils, a loamy sand and a silty soil, were
amended with biocharand digestate in separate experiments,
with field application rates of 25 Mg/ha and 34 Mg/ha,
respectively. Forcomparison a third soil, a forest soil, was
incubated without any amendment. The amendments were mixed
intothe top 20 cm of the field soils, resulting in final
concentrations of 8-9 g biochar/Kg soil and 11-12 g
digestate/Kgsoil. The soils were incubated for about six
months at room temperature. Sorption-desorption experiments
wereperformed with CsCl and SrCl2 after pre-equilibrating
the soils with CaCl2 solutions.The amendments with field
application rates did not have a significant effect on the
relevant soil parametersresponsible for the sorption
behavior of the two radionuclides. Comparatively, the soil
type lead to distinctivedifferences in sorption-desorption
dynamics of the two radionuclides. Cesium showed a higher
affinity for siltysoil followed by forest soil and lowest
for sandy soil. Comparatively, strontium displayed a lower
adsorption forall three soils, with a slightly higher
adsorption in silty soil and almost similar sorption for
both forest and sandysoils.We conclude that the applied
organic amendments with field application rates will not
deplete the FES(Frayed Edge Sites) responsible for cesium
sorption in mineral soils. Furthermore, with the present
applicationrates the increase in amount of organic matter is
not high enough to significantly affect the strontium
sorption inmineral soils. The desorption experiments showed
that about 1/3 of the adsorbed cesium was extractable in
siltysoil and almost half was extractable in forest and
sandy soils. In case of strontium, about half was
extractable inthe three soils. Similar to sorption, the
effect of amendments was negligible compared to the soil
type.},
month = {Apr},
date = {2014-04-27},
organization = {EGU General Assembly 2014, Wien
(Österreich), 27 Apr 2014 - 2 May
2014},
cin = {IBG-3},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118},
pnm = {245 - Chemicals in the Environment (POF2-245) / 255 -
Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction
(POF3-255)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF2-245 / G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)1 / PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/172404},
}