Gast ::
| Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Cesium and strontium sorption behavior in amended agricultural soils > print |
| Hauptseite > Publikationsdatenbank > Cesium and strontium sorption behavior in amended agricultural soils > print |
| 001 | 172404 | ||
| 005 | 20210129214429.0 | ||
| 024 | 7 | _ | |a 2128/20733 |2 Handle |
| 037 | _ | _ | |a FZJ-2014-05884 |
| 041 | _ | _ | |a English |
| 082 | _ | _ | |a 550 |
| 100 | 1 | _ | |a Mehmood, Khalid |0 P:(DE-Juel1)145210 |b 0 |e Corresponding Author |u fzj |
| 111 | 2 | _ | |a EGU General Assembly 2014 |g EGU 2014 |c Wien |d 2014-04-27 - 2014-05-02 |w Österreich |
| 245 | _ | _ | |a Cesium and strontium sorption behavior in amended agricultural soils |
| 260 | _ | _ | |a Katlenburg-Lindau |c 2014 |b Soc. |
| 300 | _ | _ | |a 875 |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Abstract |b abstract |m abstract |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)1 |s 1415873497_22422 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Conference Paper |0 33 |2 EndNote |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a INPROCEEDINGS |2 BibTeX |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a conferenceObject |2 DRIVER |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Journal Article |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16 |2 PUB:(DE-HGF) |m journal |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a Output Types/Conference Abstract |2 DataCite |
| 336 | 7 | _ | |a OTHER |2 ORCID |
| 520 | _ | _ | |a Biogas digestates and biochar are emerging soil amendments. Biochar is a byproduct of pyrolysis process which isthermal decomposition of biomass to produce syngas and bio-oil. The use of biochar for soil amendment is beingpromoted for higher crop yields and carbon sequestration. Currently, the numbers of biogas plants in Germany areincreasing to meet the new energy scenarios. The sustainability of biogas industry requires proper disposal optionsfor digestate. Biogas digestates being rich in nutrients are beneficial to enhance agricultural productions. Contraryto the agronomical benefits of these organic amendments, their use can influence the mobility and bioavailabilityof soil contaminants due to nutrients competition and high organic matter content. So far, the impact of suchamendments on highly problematic contaminants like radionuclides is not truly accounted for.In the present study, sorption-desorption behavior of cesium and strontium was investigated in three soilsof different origin and texture. Two agricultural soils, a loamy sand and a silty soil, were amended with biocharand digestate in separate experiments, with field application rates of 25 Mg/ha and 34 Mg/ha, respectively. Forcomparison a third soil, a forest soil, was incubated without any amendment. The amendments were mixed intothe top 20 cm of the field soils, resulting in final concentrations of 8-9 g biochar/Kg soil and 11-12 g digestate/Kgsoil. The soils were incubated for about six months at room temperature. Sorption-desorption experiments wereperformed with CsCl and SrCl2 after pre-equilibrating the soils with CaCl2 solutions.The amendments with field application rates did not have a significant effect on the relevant soil parametersresponsible for the sorption behavior of the two radionuclides. Comparatively, the soil type lead to distinctivedifferences in sorption-desorption dynamics of the two radionuclides. Cesium showed a higher affinity for siltysoil followed by forest soil and lowest for sandy soil. Comparatively, strontium displayed a lower adsorption forall three soils, with a slightly higher adsorption in silty soil and almost similar sorption for both forest and sandysoils.We conclude that the applied organic amendments with field application rates will not deplete the FES(Frayed Edge Sites) responsible for cesium sorption in mineral soils. Furthermore, with the present applicationrates the increase in amount of organic matter is not high enough to significantly affect the strontium sorption inmineral soils. The desorption experiments showed that about 1/3 of the adsorbed cesium was extractable in siltysoil and almost half was extractable in forest and sandy soils. In case of strontium, about half was extractable inthe three soils. Similar to sorption, the effect of amendments was negligible compared to the soil type. |
| 536 | _ | _ | |a 245 - Chemicals in the Environment (POF2-245) |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-245 |c POF2-245 |f POF II |x 0 |
| 536 | _ | _ | |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 |f POF III |x 1 |c POF3-255 |a 255 - Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction (POF3-255) |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Hofmann, Diana |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129471 |b 1 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Burauel, Peter |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129442 |b 2 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Vereecken, Harry |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129549 |b 3 |u fzj |
| 700 | 1 | _ | |a Berns, Anne E. |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129438 |b 4 |u fzj |
| 773 | _ | _ | |0 PERI:(DE-600)2144416-X |p 875 |t Geophysical research abstracts |v 16 |y 2014 |x 1607-7962 |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/172404/files/EGU2014-875.pdf |
| 856 | 4 | _ | |y OpenAccess |x pdfa |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/172404/files/EGU2014-875.pdf?subformat=pdfa |
| 909 | C | O | |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:172404 |p openaire |p open_access |p VDB |p driver |p dnbdelivery |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 0 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)145210 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 1 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)129471 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 2 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)129442 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 3 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)129549 |
| 910 | 1 | _ | |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8 |k FZJ |b 4 |6 P:(DE-Juel1)129438 |
| 913 | 2 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b POF III |l Marine, Küsten- und Polare Systeme |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200 |v Terrestrische Umwelt |x 0 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |b Erde und Umwelt |l Terrestrische Umwelt |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-240 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-245 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200 |v Chemicals in the Environment |x 0 |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF2 |
| 913 | 1 | _ | |a DE-HGF |9 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 |x 1 |v Terrestrial Systems: From Observation to Prediction |1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-250 |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-255 |2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200 |l Terrestrische Umwelt |4 G:(DE-HGF)POF |3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3 |b Erde und Umwelt |
| 914 | 1 | _ | |y 2014 |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 |0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY3 |2 HGFVOC |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a No Peer Review |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0020 |2 StatID |
| 915 | _ | _ | |a OpenAccess |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510 |2 StatID |
| 920 | _ | _ | |l yes |
| 920 | 1 | _ | |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |k IBG-3 |l Agrosphäre |x 0 |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a abstract |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a VDB |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a UNRESTRICTED |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a journal |
| 980 | _ | _ | |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-3-20101118 |
| 980 | 1 | _ | |a FullTexts |
| Library | Collection | CLSMajor | CLSMinor | Language | Author |
|---|