Home > Publications database > Comparison of Y and La-substituted SrTiO$_{3}$ as the anode materials for SOFCs > print

001     172713
005     20240711085620.0
024 7 _ |2 doi
|a 10.1016/j.ssi.2012.03.048
024 7 _ |2 ISSN
|a 0167-2738
024 7 _ |2 ISSN
|a 1872-7689
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000311873400022
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2014-06158
082 _ _ |a 530
100 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129628
|a Ma, Qianli
|b 0
|e Corresponding Author
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a Comparison of Y and La-substituted SrTiO$_{3}$ as the anode materials for SOFCs
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|b Elsevier Science
|c 2012
336 7 _ |0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
|a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|s 1417092459_32495
336 7 _ |2 DataCite
|a Output Types/Journal article
336 7 _ |0 0
|2 EndNote
|a Journal Article
336 7 _ |2 BibTeX
|a ARTICLE
336 7 _ |2 ORCID
|a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
336 7 _ |2 DRIVER
|a article
520 _ _ |a Y0.07Sr0.895TiO3 (YST) and La0.2Sr0.7TiO3 (LST) samples sintered and reduced at different temperatures were prepared. The conductivity and chemical expansion of the samples were tested. It was found that the combination of high conductivity and low chemical expansion therefore represents a conflict of material properties for YST and LST samples. The relationship between chemical expansion and sample cracking is discussed. The conductivity of the samples against redox cycles was also tested. Properties with respect to SOFC requirements were compared between LST and YST samples. Suitable preparation conditions for YST and LST as SOFC anode materials were optimized.
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-123
|a 123 - Fuel Cells (POF2-123)
|c POF2-123
|f POF II
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, juser.fz-juelich.de
650 2 7 |0 V:(DE-MLZ)SciArea-180
|2 V:(DE-HGF)
|a Materials Science
|x 0
650 1 7 |0 V:(DE-MLZ)GC-110
|2 V:(DE-HGF)
|a Energy
|x 0
693 _ _ |0 EXP:(DE-MLZ)External-20140101
|5 EXP:(DE-MLZ)External-20140101
|e External Measurement
|x 0
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129667
|a Tietz, Frank
|b 1
|u fzj
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)1500750-9
|a 10.1016/j.ssi.2012.03.048
|g Vol. 225, p. 108 - 112
|p 108 - 112
|t Solid state ionics
|v 225
|x 0167-2738
|y 2012
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/172713/files/FZJ-2014-06158.pdf
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:172713
|p VDB
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129628
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|b 0
|k FZJ
910 1 _ |0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)129667
|a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|b 1
|k FZJ
913 2 _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-135
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-130
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-100
|a DE-HGF
|b POF III
|l Forschungsbereich Energie
|v Speicher und vernetzte Infrastrukturen
|x 0
913 1 _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-123
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-120
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-100
|a DE-HGF
|b Energie
|l Rationelle Energieumwandlung und -nutzung
|v Fuel Cells
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF2
914 1 _ |y 2014
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|a JCR
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|a WoS
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|a WoS
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0420
|2 StatID
|a Nationallizenz
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
|a IF < 5
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-1-20101013
|k IEK-1
|l Werkstoffsynthese und Herstellungsverfahren
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-1-20101013
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IMD-2-20101013

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21