001     173156
005     20210129214558.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1007/s00259-014-2959-4
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0340-6997
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1432-105X
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1619-7070
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1619-7089
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a WOS:000350686300004
|2 WOS
024 7 _ |a altmetric:3762284
|2 altmetric
024 7 _ |a pmid:25411133
|2 pmid
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2014-06569
082 _ _ |a 610
100 1 _ |a Galldiks, Norbert
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)143792
|b 0
|e Corresponding Author
|u fzj
245 _ _ |a Diagnosis of pseudoprogression in patients with glioblastoma using O-(2-[$^{18}$F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine PET
260 _ _ |a Heidelberg [u.a.]
|c 2015
|b Springer-Verl.
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1439788362_7252
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
520 _ _ |a PurposeThe follow-up of glioblastoma patients after radiochemotherapy with conventional MRI can be difficult since reactive alterations to the blood–brain barrier with contrast enhancement may mimic tumour progression (i.e. pseudoprogression, PsP). The aim of this study was to assess the clinical value of O-(2-18F-fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) PET in the differentiation of PsP and early tumour progression (EP) after radiochemotherapy of glioblastoma.MethodsA group of 22 glioblastoma patients with new contrast-enhancing lesions or lesions showing increased enhancement (>25 %) on standard MRI within the first 12 weeks after completion of radiochemotherapy with concomitant temozolomide (median 7 weeks) were additionally examined using amino acid PET with 18F-FET. Maximum and mean tumour-to-brain ratios (TBRmax, TBRmean) were determined. 18F-FET uptake kinetic parameters (i.e. patterns of time–activity curves, TAC) were also evaluated. Classification as PsP or EP was based on the clinical course (no treatment change at least for 6 months), follow-up MR imaging and/or histopathological findings. Imaging results were also related to overall survival (OS).ResultsPsP was confirmed in 11 of the 22 patients. In patients with PsP, 18F-FET uptake was significantly lower than in patients with EP (TBRmax 1.9 ± 0.4 vs. 2.8 ± 0.5, TBRmean 1.8 ± 0.2 vs. 2.3 ± 0.3; both P < 0.001) and presence of MGMT promoter methylation was significantly more frequent (P = 0.05). Furthermore, a TAC type II or III was more frequently present in patients with EP (P = 0.04). Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the optimal 18F-FET TBRmax cut-off value for identifying PsP was 2.3 (sensitivity 100 %, specificity 91 %, accuracy 96 %, AUC 0.94 ± 0.06; P < 0.001). Univariate survival analysis showed that a TBRmax <2.3 predicted a significantly longer OS (median OS 23 vs. 12 months; P = 0.046).Conclusion18F-FET PET may facilitate the diagnosis of PsP following radiochemotherapy of glioblastoma.
536 _ _ |a 572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|c POF3-572
|x 0
|f POF III
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Dunkl, Veronika
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)156211
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Stoffels, Gabriele
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131627
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Hutterer, Markus
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 3
700 1 _ |a Rapp, Marion
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 4
700 1 _ |a Sabel, Michael
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)165921
|b 5
700 1 _ |a Reifenberger, Guido
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 6
700 1 _ |a Kebir, Sied
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
700 1 _ |a Dorn, Franziska
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 8
700 1 _ |a Blau, Tobias
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 9
700 1 _ |a Herrlinger, Ulrich
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 10
700 1 _ |a Hau, Peter
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 11
700 1 _ |a Ruge, Maximilian I.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 12
700 1 _ |a Kocher, Martin
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 13
700 1 _ |a Goldbrunner, Roland
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 14
700 1 _ |a Fink, Gereon R.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
|b 15
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Drzezga, Alexander
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 16
700 1 _ |a Schmidt, Matthias
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)157935
|b 17
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Langen, Karl-Josef
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131777
|b 18
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1007/s00259-014-2959-4
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2098375-X
|n 5
|p 685-695
|t European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
|v 42
|y 2015
|x 1619-7089
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/173156/files/art_10.1007_s00259-014-2959-4.pdf
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/173156/files/art_10.1007_s00259-014-2959-4.gif?subformat=icon
|x icon
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/173156/files/art_10.1007_s00259-014-2959-4.jpg?subformat=icon-1440
|x icon-1440
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/173156/files/art_10.1007_s00259-014-2959-4.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|x icon-180
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/173156/files/art_10.1007_s00259-014-2959-4.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|x icon-640
|y Restricted
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/173156/files/art_10.1007_s00259-014-2959-4.pdf?subformat=pdfa
|x pdfa
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:173156
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 0
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)143792
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131627
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 15
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131720
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 17
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)157935
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 18
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131777
913 0 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Gesundheit
|l Funktion und Dysfunktion des Nervensystems
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-330
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-333
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-300
|v Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Neurological and Psychiatric Diseases
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v (Dys-)function and Plasticity
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
914 1 _ |y 2015
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1110
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Clinical Medicine
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1030
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Life Sciences
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
|k INM-3
|l Kognitive Neurowissenschaften
|x 0
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406
|k INM-4
|l Physik der Medizinischen Bildgebung
|x 1
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-4-20090406


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21