001     173335
005     20240712101040.0
024 7 _ |a 10.5194/amt-7-1571-2014
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 1867-1381
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1867-8548
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 2128/8139
|2 Handle
024 7 _ |a WOS:000339935900004
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2014-06745
082 _ _ |a 550
100 1 _ |a Kaiser, J.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding Author
245 _ _ |a Intercomparison of Hantzsch and fiber-laser-induced-fluorescence formaldehyde measurements
260 _ _ |a Katlenburg-Lindau
|c 2014
|b Copernicus
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 173335
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
520 _ _ |a Two gas-phase formaldehyde (HCHO) measurement techniques, a modified commercial wet-chemical instrument based on Hantzsch fluorimetry and a custom-built instrument based on fiber laser-induced fluorescence (FILIF), were deployed at the atmospheric simulation chamber SAPHIR (Simulation of Atmospheric PHotochemistry In a large Reaction Chamber) to compare the instruments' performances under a range of conditions. Thermolysis of para-HCHO and ozonolysis of 1-butene were used as HCHO sources, allowing for calculations of theoretical HCHO mixing ratios. Calculated HCHO mixing ratios are compared to measurements, and the two measurements are also compared. Experiments were repeated under dry and humid conditions (RH < 2% and RH > 60%) to investigate the possibility of a water artifact in the FILIF measurements. The ozonolysis of 1-butene also allowed for the investigation of an ozone artifact seen in some Hantzsch measurements in previous intercomparisons. Results show that under all conditions the two techniques are well correlated (R2 ≥ 0.997), and linear regression statistics show measurements agree with within stated uncertainty (15% FILIF + 5% Hantzsch). No water or ozone artifacts are identified. While a slight curvature is observed in some Hantzsch vs. FILIF regressions, the potential for variable instrument sensitivity cannot be attributed to a single instrument at this time. Measurements at low concentrations highlight the need for a secondary method for testing the purity of air used in instrument zeroing and the need for further FILIF White cell outgassing experiments.
536 _ _ |a 233 - Trace gas and aerosol processes in the troposphere (POF2-233)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-233
|c POF2-233
|f POF II
|x 0
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-Juel1)HITEC-20170406
|x 1
|c HITEC-20170406
|a HITEC - Helmholtz Interdisciplinary Doctoral Training in Energy and Climate Research (HITEC) (HITEC-20170406)
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Li, Xin
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)6775
|b 1
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Tillmann, R.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)5344
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Acir, I.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)136889
|b 3
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Holland, F.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)16342
|b 4
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Rohrer, F.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)16347
|b 5
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Wegener, R.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)2367
|b 6
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Keutsch, F. N.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 7
773 _ _ |a 10.5194/amt-7-1571-2014
|g Vol. 7, no. 6, p. 1571 - 1580
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2505596-3
|n 6
|p 1571 - 1580
|t Atmospheric measurement techniques
|v 7
|y 2014
|x 1867-8548
856 4 _ |u www.atmos-meas-tech.net/7/1571/2014/
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/173335/files/FZJ-2014-06745.pdf
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/173335/files/FZJ-2014-06745.jpg?subformat=icon-144
|x icon-144
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/173335/files/FZJ-2014-06745.jpg?subformat=icon-180
|x icon-180
|y OpenAccess
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/173335/files/FZJ-2014-06745.jpg?subformat=icon-640
|x icon-640
|y OpenAccess
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:173335
|p openaire
|p open_access
|p driver
|p VDB:Earth_Environment
|p VDB
|p dnbdelivery
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 1
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)6775
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)5344
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)136889
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 4
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)16342
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 5
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)16347
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 6
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)2367
913 2 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Marine, Küsten- und Polare Systeme
|l Atmosphäre und Klima
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-240
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-243
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-200
|v Tropospheric trace substances and their transformation processes
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Erde und Umwelt
|l Atmosphäre und Klima
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-230
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-233
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200
|v Trace gas and aerosol processes in the troposphere
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF2
914 1 _ |y 2014
915 _ _ |a Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0
|0 LIC:(DE-HGF)CCBY3
|2 HGFVOC
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0500
|2 StatID
|b DOAJ
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a OpenAccess
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0510
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a IF < 5
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)9900
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1150
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Physical, Chemical and Earth Sciences
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|b Medline
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013
|k IEK-8
|l Troposphäre
|x 0
980 1 _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED
980 _ _ |a FullTexts
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013
981 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)ICE-3-20101013


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21