001     17527
005     20200423203058.0
024 7 _ |2 pmid
|a pmid:22085245
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03952.x
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000298300800009
024 7 _ |a altmetric:1305629
|2 altmetric
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-17527
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 580
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Plant Sciences
100 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)129384
|a Poorter, H.
|b 0
|u FZJ
245 _ _ |a Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control
260 _ _ |a Oxford [u.a.]
|b Wiley-Blackwell
|c 2012
300 _ _ |a 30 - 50
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |0 4600
|a New Phytologist
|v 193
|x 0028-646X
|y 1
500 _ _ |a The generous support of Uli Schurr for the Meta-Phenomics project and the IT help of Gerhard Bonisch have been essential for this review. Special thanks go to those colleagues who were so kind to provide us with additional or as yet unpublished data: Paul Anderson, Owen Atkin, Damian Barrett, Mark Bloomberg, Charles Canham, Brenda Casper, Terry Chapin, Hans Cornelissen, Corine de Groot, Ahmed Debez, Moacyr Dias-Filho, Michael Forster, Jurgen Franzaring, Keith Funnell, Anders Glimskar, Andrzej M. Jagodzinski, Corien Jansen, Miko Kirschbaum, Ken Krauss, Fang-Li Luo, Leo Marcelis, Kerstin Nagel, Manuel Nieves, Ronald Pierik, Thijs Pons, Peter Ryser, Gunda Schulte auf'm Erley, Peter Searles, Max Taub, Danny Tholen, Elmar Veenendaal, Erik Veneklaas, Rafael Villar and Chin Wong. We thank Brian Enquist for insightful discussions. Thijs Pons, Roland Pieruschka, John Lunn, Jake Weiner and three reviewers made insightful remarks on a previous version of the manuscript. Support from the Wilderness Research Foundation and the National Science Foundation (DEB 0620652) is also acknowledged.
520 _ _ |a We quantified the biomass allocation patterns to leaves, stems and roots in vegetative plants, and how this is influenced by the growth environment, plant size, evolutionary history and competition. Dose-response curves of allocation were constructed by means of a meta-analysis from a wide array of experimental data. They show that the fraction of whole-plant mass represented by leaves (LMF) increases most strongly with nutrients and decreases most strongly with light. Correction for size-induced allocation patterns diminishes the LMF-response to light, but makes the effect of temperature on LMF more apparent. There is a clear phylogenetic effect on allocation, as eudicots invest relatively more than monocots in leaves, as do gymnosperms compared with woody angiosperms. Plants grown at high densities show a clear increase in the stem fraction. However, in most comparisons across species groups or environmental factors, the variation in LMF is smaller than the variation in one of the other components of the growth analysis equation: the leaf area : leaf mass ratio (SLA). In competitive situations, the stem mass fraction increases to a smaller extent than the specific stem length (stem length : stem mass). Thus, we conclude that plants generally are less able to adjust allocation than to alter organ morphology.
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|a Terrestrische Umwelt
|c P24
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Biomass
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Plant Leaves: growth & development
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Plant Roots: growth & development
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Plant Stems: growth & development
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Species Specificity
650 _ 7 |2 WoSType
|a J
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a allocation
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a allometry
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a dose-response curve
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a environment
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a functional types
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a global change
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a meta-phenomics
653 2 0 |2 Author
|a partitioning
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Niklas, K.J.
|b 1
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Reich, P.B.
|b 2
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Oleksyn, J.
|b 3
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Poot, P.
|b 4
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Mommer, L.
|b 5
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)1472194-6
|a 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03952.x
|g Vol. 193, p. 30 - 50
|p 30 - 50
|q 193<30 - 50
|t The @new phytologist
|v 193
|x 0028-646X
|y 2012
856 7 _ |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03952.x
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/17527/files/FZJ-17527.pdf
|y Restricted
|z Published final document.
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:17527
|p VDB
913 1 _ |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK407
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-240
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-200
|a DE-HGF
|b Erde und Umwelt
|k P24
|l Terrestrische Umwelt
|v Terrestrische Umwelt
|x 0
913 2 _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-580
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Key Technologies for the Bioeconomy
|v Plant Science
|x 0
914 1 _ |y 2012
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0010
|2 StatID
|a JCR/ISI refereed
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|a JCR
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0110
|2 StatID
|a WoS
|b Science Citation Index
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|a WoS
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Medline
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0310
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b NCBI Molecular Biology Database
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0430
|2 StatID
|a National-Konsortium
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1050
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b BIOSIS Previews
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1060
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Current Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
|g IBG
|k IBG-2
|l Pflanzenwissenschaften
|x 0
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)132024
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21