% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Hoerger:185740,
author = {Hoerger, C. C. and Werner, A. and Plass-Duelmer, C. and
Reimann, S. and Eckart, E. and Steinbrecher, R. and Aalto,
J. and Arduini, J. and Bonnaire, N. and Cape, J. N. and
Colomb, A. and Connolly, R. and Diskova, J. and Dumitrean,
P. and Ehlers, C. and Gros, V. and Hakola, H. and Hill, M.
and Hopkins, J. R. and Jäger, J. and Junek, R. and Kajos,
M. K. and Klemp, D. and Leuchner, M. and Lewis, A. C. and
Locoge, N. and Maione, M. and Martin, D. and Michl, K. and
Nemitz, E. and O'Doherty, S. and Pérez Ballesta, P. and
Ruuskanen, T. M. and Sauvage, S. and Schmidbauer, N. and
Spain, T. G. and Straube, E. and Vana, M. and Vollmer, M. K.
and Wegener, R. and Wenger, A.},
title = {{ACTRIS} non-methane hydrocarbon intercomparison experiment
in {E}urope to support {WMO}-{GAW} and {EMEP} observation
networks},
journal = {Atmospheric measurement techniques discussions},
volume = {7},
number = {10},
issn = {1867-8610},
address = {Katlenburg-Lindau},
publisher = {Copernicus},
reportid = {FZJ-2014-07165},
pages = {10423 - 10485},
year = {2014},
abstract = {The performance of 20 European laboratories involved in
long-term non-methane hydrocarbon (NMHC) measurements within
the framework of Global Atmosphere Watch (GAW) and European
Monitoring and Evaluation Programme (EMEP) was assessed with
respect to the ACTRIS (Aerosols, Clouds, and Trace gases
Research InfraStructure Network) and GAW data quality
objectives (DQOs). Compared to previous intercomparisons the
DQOs of ACTRIS are much more demanding with deviations to a
reference value of less than $5\%$ and repeatability of
better than $2\%$ for mole fractions above 0.1 nmol
mol−1.The participants were asked to measure both a 30
component NMHC mixture in nitrogen $(NMHC_N2)$ at
approximately 1 nmol mol−1 and whole air $(NMHC_air),$
following a standardised operation procedure including zero-
and calibration gas measurements. Furthermore, they had to
report details on their instruments and they were asked to
assess measurement uncertainties.The NMHCs were analysed
either by gas chromatography-flame ionisation detection or
gas chromatography-mass spectrometer methods. Most systems
performed well for the $NMHC_N2$ measurements $(88\%$ of the
reported values were within the GAW DQOs and even $58\%$
within the ACTRIS DQOs). For $NMHC_air$ generally more
frequent and larger deviations to the assigned values were
observed compared to $NMHC_N2$ $(77\%$ of the reported
values were within the GAW DQOs, but only $48\%$ within the
ACTRIS DQOs). Important contributors to the poorer
performance in $NMHC_air$ compared to $NMHC_N2$ were a more
complex matrix and a larger span of NMHC mole fractions
(0.03–2.5 nmol mol−1). Issues, which affected both NMHC
mixtures, are the usage of direct vs. two-step calibration,
breakthrough of C2–C3 hydrocarbons, blank values in
zero-gas measurements (especially for those systems using a
Nafion® Dryer), adsorptive losses of aromatic compounds,
and insufficient chromatographic resolution. Essential for
high-quality results are experienced operators, a
comprehensive quality assurance and quality control, well
characterised systems, and sufficient man-power to operate
the systems and evaluate the data.},
cin = {IEK-8},
ddc = {550},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-8-20101013},
pnm = {233 - Trace gas and aerosol processes in the troposphere
(POF2-233)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF2-233},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
doi = {10.5194/amtd-7-10423-2014},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/185740},
}