% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Fanourakis:185940,
author = {Fanourakis, Dimitrios and Giday, H. and Milla, R. and
Pieruschka, R. and Kjaer, K. H. and Bolger, M. and
Vasilevski, A. and Nunes-Nesi, A. and Fiorani, F. and
Ottosen, C.-O.},
title = {{P}ore size regulates operating stomatal conductance, while
stomatal densities drive the partitioning of conductance
between leaf sides},
journal = {Annals of botany},
volume = {115},
number = {4},
issn = {1095-8290},
address = {Oxford},
publisher = {Oxford University Press},
reportid = {FZJ-2015-00064},
pages = {555-565},
year = {2015},
abstract = {Background and Aims Leaf gas exchange is influenced by
stomatal size, density, distribution between the leaf
adaxial and abaxial sides, as well as by pore dimensions.
This study aims to quantify which of these traits mainly
underlie genetic differences in operating stomatal
conductance (gs) and addresses possible links between
anatomical traits and regulation of pore width.Methods
Stomatal responsiveness to desiccation, gs-related
anatomical traits of each leaf side and estimated gs (based
on these traits) were determined for 54 introgression lines
(ILs) generated by introgressing segments of Solanum
pennelli into the S. lycopersicum ‘M82’. A quantitative
trait locus (QTL) analysis for stomatal traits was also
performed.Key Results A wide genetic variation in stomatal
responsiveness to desiccation was observed, a large part of
which was explained by stomatal length. Operating gs ranged
over a factor of five between ILs. The pore area per
stomatal area varied 8-fold among ILs (2–16 $\%),$ and was
the main determinant of differences in operating gs between
ILs. Operating gs was primarily positioned on the abaxial
surface (60–83 $\%),$ due to higher abaxial stomatal
density and, secondarily, to larger abaxial pore area. An
analysis revealed 64 QTLs for stomatal traits in the ILs,
most of which were in the direction of S.
pennellii.Conclusions The data indicate that operating and
maximum gs of non-stressed leaves maintained under stable
conditions deviate considerably (by 45–91 $\%),$ because
stomatal size inadequately reflects operating pore area
(R2 = 0·46). Furthermore, it was found that variation
between ILs in both stomatal sensitivity to desiccation and
operating gs is associated with features of individual
stoma. In contrast, genotypic variation in gs partitioning
depends on the distribution of stomata between the leaf
adaxial and abaxial epidermis.},
cin = {IBG-2},
ddc = {580},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {582 - Plant Science (POF3-582) / EPPN - European Plant
Phenotyping Network (284443)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582 / G:(EU-Grant)284443},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000354066600001},
pubmed = {pmid:25538116},
doi = {10.1093/aob/mcu247},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/185940},
}