% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Volz:186319,
      author       = {Volz, K. G. and Vogeley, Kai and Tittgemeyer, M. and von
                      Cramon, D. Y. and Sutter, M.},
      title        = {{T}he neural basis of deception in strategic interactions.},
      journal      = {Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience},
      volume       = {9},
      issn         = {1662-5153},
      address      = {Lausanne},
      publisher    = {Frontiers Research Foundation},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2015-00395},
      pages        = {27 (1-2)},
      year         = {2015},
      abstract     = {Communication based on informational asymmetries abounds in
                      politics, business, and almost any other form of social
                      interaction. Informational asymmetries may create incentives
                      for the better-informed party to exploit her advantage by
                      misrepresenting information. Using a game-theoretic setting,
                      we investigate the neural basis of deception in human
                      interaction. Unlike in most previous fMRI research on
                      deception, the participants decide themselves whether to lie
                      or not. We find activation within the right temporo-parietal
                      junction (rTPJ), the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC),
                      the (pre)cuneus (CUN), and the anterior frontal gyrus (aFG)
                      when contrasting lying with truth telling. Notably, our
                      design also allows for an investigation of the neural
                      foundations of sophisticated deception through telling the
                      truth—when the sender does not expect the receiver to
                      believe her (true) message. Sophisticated deception triggers
                      activation within the same network as plain lies, i.e., we
                      find activity within the rTPJ, the CUN, and aFG. We take
                      this result to show that brain activation can reveal the
                      sender’s veridical intention to deceive others,
                      irrespective of whether in fact the sender utters the
                      factual truth or not.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000349358200001},
      pubmed       = {pmid:25729358},
      doi          = {10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00027},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/186319},
}