001     186412
005     20210129214904.0
024 7 _ |a 10.1016/j.mejo.2014.09.012
|2 doi
024 7 _ |a 0026-2692
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a 1879-2391
|2 ISSN
024 7 _ |a WOS:000345641800008
|2 WOS
037 _ _ |a FZJ-2015-00488
082 _ _ |a 620
100 1 _ |a Ferch, S.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 0
|e Corresponding Author
245 _ _ |a Simulation and comparison of two sequential logic-in-memory approaches using a dynamic electrochemical metallization cell model
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|c 2014
|b Elsevier Science
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|b journal
|m journal
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|s 1421311507_12770
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
520 _ _ |a Resistive switching devices are an emerging class of non-volatile memory elements suited for application in passive nano-crossbar arrays. These devices can be modeled as dynamical systems, i.e. memristive devices or memristors for short. The built-in non-linear switching kinetics of these devices enables the performance of ‘stateful’ logic operations and widens the applicability of memory arrays towards logic operations. In this work, two logic-in-memories approaches are studied by means of dynamical simulations. The first one is the initial ‘stateful’ logic concept introduced by Boghetti et al., and the second approach is the complementary switch-based concept later suggested by Linn et al. In both cases, the considered device is an electrochemical metallization cell for which good dynamical models are available. The study is limited to the comparison of elementary logic functions—multi-stage logic as well as parallelization features of both approaches are not considered here. A comparison of the elementary logic IMP and NAND operations in terms of reliability, switching energy and basic array compatibility is conducted, and crucial requirements for both approaches are identified.
536 _ _ |a 421 - Frontiers of charge based Electronics (POF2-421)
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-421
|c POF2-421
|f POF II
|x 0
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to CrossRef, juser.fz-juelich.de
700 1 _ |a Linn, E.
|0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|b 1
700 1 _ |a Waser, R.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)131022
|b 2
|u fzj
700 1 _ |a Menzel, S.
|0 P:(DE-Juel1)158062
|b 3
|u fzj
773 _ _ |a 10.1016/j.mejo.2014.09.012
|g Vol. 45, no. 11, p. 1416 - 1428
|0 PERI:(DE-600)2000567-2
|n 11
|p 1416 - 1428
|t Microelectronics journal
|v 45
|y 2014
|x 0026-2692
856 4 _ |u https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/186412/files/FZJ-2015-00488.pdf
|y Restricted
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:186412
|p VDB
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 2
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)131022
910 1 _ |a Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH
|0 I:(DE-588b)5008462-8
|k FZJ
|b 3
|6 P:(DE-Juel1)158062
913 2 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Future Information Technology - Fundamentals, Novel Concepts and Energy Efficiency (FIT)
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-520
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-521
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|v Controlling Electron Charge-Based Phenomena
|x 0
913 1 _ |a DE-HGF
|b Schlüsseltechnologien
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-420
|0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-421
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-400
|v Frontiers of charge based Electronics
|x 0
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF2
|l Grundlagen zukünftiger Informationstechnologien
914 1 _ |y 2014
915 _ _ |a JCR
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
915 _ _ |a WoS
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0200
|2 StatID
|b SCOPUS
915 _ _ |a DBCoverage
|0 StatID:(DE-HGF)1160
|2 StatID
|b Current Contents - Engineering, Computing and Technology
920 _ _ |l yes
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)PGI-7-20110106
|k PGI-7
|l Elektronische Materialien
|x 0
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)PGI-7-20110106
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED


LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21