000187268 001__ 187268
000187268 005__ 20210129215000.0
000187268 0247_ $$2doi$$a10.1093/treephys/tpu105
000187268 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a0829-318X
000187268 0247_ $$2ISSN$$a1758-4469
000187268 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000354778300004
000187268 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:4366392
000187268 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:25595754
000187268 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/26556
000187268 037__ $$aFZJ-2015-00941
000187268 041__ $$aEnglish
000187268 082__ $$a630
000187268 1001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)129422$$aWindt, Carel$$b0$$eCorresponding Author$$ufzj
000187268 245__ $$aA portable NMR sensor to measure dynamic changes in the amount of water in living stems or fruit and its potential to measure sap flow
000187268 260__ $$aVictoria, BC$$bHeron$$c2015
000187268 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000187268 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000187268 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article$$bjournal$$mjournal$$s1430730229_23235
000187268 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000187268 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000187268 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000187268 520__ $$aNuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and NMR imaging (magnetic resonance imaging) offer the possibility to quantitatively and non-invasively measure the presence and movement of water. Unfortunately, traditional NMR hardware is expensive, poorly suited for plants, and because of its bulk and complexity, not suitable for use in the field. But does it need to be? We here explore how novel, small-scale portable NMR devices can be used as a flow sensor to directly measure xylem sap flow in a poplar tree (Populus nigra L.), or in a dendrometer-like fashion to measure dynamic changes in the absolute water content of fruit or stems. For the latter purpose we monitored the diurnal pattern of growth, expansion and shrinkage in a model fruit (bean pod, Phaseolus vulgaris L.) and in the stem of an oak tree (Quercus robur L.). We compared changes in absolute stem water content, as measured by the NMR sensor, against stem diameter variations as measured by a set of conventional point dendrometers, to test how well the sensitivities of the two methods compare and to investigate how well diurnal changes in trunk absolute water content correlate with the concomitant diurnal variations in stem diameter. Our results confirm the existence of a strong correlation between the two parameters, but also suggest that dynamic changes in oak stem water content could be larger than is apparent on the basis of the stem diameter variation alone.
000187268 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89582$$a89582 - Plant Science (POF2-89582)$$cPOF2-89582$$fPOF II T$$x0
000187268 588__ $$aDataset connected to CrossRef, juser.fz-juelich.de
000187268 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aBlumler, P.$$b1
000187268 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)1473475-8$$a10.1093/treephys/tpu105$$gp. tpu105$$n4$$p366-375$$tTree physiology$$v35$$x1758-4469$$y2015
000187268 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/187268/files/FZJ-2015-00941.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000187268 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:187268$$pdnbdelivery$$pdriver$$pVDB$$popen_access$$popenaire
000187268 9101_ $$0I:(DE-588b)5008462-8$$6P:(DE-Juel1)129422$$aForschungszentrum Jülich GmbH$$b0$$kFZJ
000187268 9130_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89582$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89580$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-890$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lKey Technologies for the Bioeconomy$$vPlant Science$$x0
000187268 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89582$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-890$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-800$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bProgrammungebundene Forschung$$lohne Programm$$vPlant Science$$x0
000187268 9141_ $$y2015
000187268 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000187268 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1050$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bBIOSIS Previews
000187268 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000187268 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR
000187268 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000187268 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000187268 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000187268 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)9900$$2StatID$$aIF <  5
000187268 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0400$$2StatID$$aAllianz-Lizenz / DFG
000187268 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1060$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bCurrent Contents - Agriculture, Biology and Environmental Sciences
000187268 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0310$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bNCBI Molecular Biology Database
000187268 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000187268 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000187268 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000187268 920__ $$lyes
000187268 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118$$kIBG-2$$lPflanzenwissenschaften$$x0
000187268 980__ $$ajournal
000187268 980__ $$aVDB
000187268 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000187268 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118
000187268 9801_ $$aFullTexts