% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Zhao:188001,
      author       = {Zhao, Li and Brinkmann, Torsten and Bram, Martin and
                      Stolten, Detlef and Pohlmann, Jan and Akos, Tota},
      title        = {{I}nvestigating the {I}nfluence of the {P}ressure
                      {D}istribution in a {M}embrane {M}odule on the {C}ascaded
                      {M}embrane {S}ystem for {P}ost-{C}ombustion {C}apture},
      journal      = {International journal of greenhouse gas control},
      volume       = {39},
      issn         = {1750-5836},
      address      = {New York, NY [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Elsevier},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2015-01490},
      pages        = {194 - 204},
      year         = {2015},
      abstract     = {Polyactive® membranes show promising properties for CO2
                      separation from flue gas. An investigation of different
                      module types using Polyactive® membranes was carried out
                      for this paper. A test rig was built to explore, amongst
                      other process parameters, the pressure drop in envelope-type
                      membrane modules. The experimental data and simulation
                      results were compared with quite good consistency. This
                      validation enabled further simulations for different modules
                      in a virtual pilot plant configuration. Applying the data
                      from the pilot plant simulation to a reference power plant,
                      the scaled-up cascaded membrane system was analyzed using
                      different membrane modules. Considering the required
                      membrane area, energy consumption and pressure drop in
                      different modules, a counter-current membrane module
                      configuration exhibited the best performance and had a
                      marginal advantage in comparison with the chemical
                      absorption process.},
      cin          = {IEK-3 / IEK-1},
      ddc          = {333.7},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-3-20101013 / I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-1-20101013},
      pnm          = {111 - Efficient and Flexible Power Plants (POF3-111) / 113
                      - Methods and Concepts for Material Development (POF3-113)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-111 / G:(DE-HGF)POF3-113},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000358627100019},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.ijggc.2015.03.010},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/188001},
}