% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Rahe:188894,
      author       = {Rahe, J. and Liesk, J. and Rosen, J. and Petrelli, A. and
                      Kaesberg, S. and Özgür, O. and Kessler, J. and Fink, G. R.
                      and Kalbe, E.},
      title        = {{S}ex {D}ifferences in {C}ognitive {T}raining {E}ffects of
                      {P}atients with {A}mnestic {M}ild {C}ognitive {I}mpairment.},
      journal      = {Aging, neuropsychology, and cognition},
      volume       = {22},
      number       = {5},
      issn         = {1382-5585},
      address      = {Lisse},
      publisher    = {Swets $\&$ Zeitlinger},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2015-02192},
      pages        = {620-638},
      year         = {2015},
      abstract     = {Cognitive training has been shown to be effective in
                      improving cognitive functions in patients with Mild
                      Cognitive Impairment (MCI). However, data on factors that
                      may influence training gains including sociodemographic
                      variables such as sex or age is rare. In this study, the
                      impact of sex on cognitive training effects was examined in
                      N = 32 age- and education-matched female (n = 16) and male
                      (n = 16) amnestic MCI patients (total sample: age M = 74.97,
                      SD = 5.21; education M = 13.50, SD = 3.11). Patients
                      participated in a six-week multidomain cognitive training
                      program including 12 sessions each 90 min twice weekly in
                      mixed groups with both women and men. Various cognitive
                      domains were assessed before and after the intervention.
                      Despite comparable baseline performance in women and men, we
                      found significant interaction effects Time × Sex in
                      immediate (p = .04) and delayed verbal episodic memory (p=
                      .045) as well as in working memory (p = .042) favoring the
                      female MCI patients. In contrast, the overall analyses with
                      the total sample did not reveal any significant
                      within-subject effects Time. In conclusion, our results give
                      preliminary evidence for stronger cognitive training
                      improvements of female compared to male MCI patients. More
                      generally, they emphasize the importance of sex-sensitive
                      evaluations of cognitive training effects. Possible
                      underlying mechanisms of the found sex differences are
                      discussed and directions for future research are given.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000356295400007},
      pubmed       = {pmid:25818876},
      doi          = {10.1080/13825585.2015.1028883},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/188894},
}