000019674 001__ 19674
000019674 005__ 20230217124408.0
000019674 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1103/PhysRevA.85.012101
000019674 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000298860600003
000019674 0247_ $$2Handle$$a2128/11168
000019674 0247_ $$2altmetric$$aaltmetric:490590
000019674 037__ $$aPreJuSER-19674
000019674 041__ $$aeng
000019674 082__ $$a530
000019674 084__ $$2WoS$$aOptics
000019674 084__ $$2WoS$$aPhysics, Atomic, Molecular & Chemical
000019674 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aDe Raedt, H.$$b0
000019674 245__ $$aAnalysis of multipath interference in three-slit experiments
000019674 260__ $$aCollege Park, Md.$$bAPS$$c2012
000019674 264_1 $$2Crossref$$3online$$bAmerican Physical Society (APS)$$c2012-01-04
000019674 264_1 $$2Crossref$$3print$$bAmerican Physical Society (APS)$$c2012-01-01
000019674 300__ $$a012101
000019674 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000019674 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000019674 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000019674 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000019674 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000019674 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000019674 440_0 $$04918$$aPhysical Review A$$v85$$x0556-2791$$y1
000019674 500__ $$aThis work was partially supported by National Computing Facilities, the Netherlands. Part of the calculations has been performed on JUGENE at JSC under VSR project 4331.
000019674 520__ $$aIt is demonstrated that the three-slit interference, as obtained from explicit solutions of Maxwell's equations for realistic models of three-slit devices, including an idealized version of the three-slit device used in a recent three-slit experiment with light [U. Sinha et al., Science 329, 418 (2010)], is nonzero. The hypothesis that the three-slit interference should be zero is the result of dropping the one-to-one correspondence between the symbols in the mathematical theory and the different experimental configurations, opening the route to conclusions that cannot be derived from the theory proper. It is also shown that under certain experimental conditions, this hypothesis is a good approximation.
000019674 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK411$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aScientific Computing (FUEK411)$$cFUEK411$$x0
000019674 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-411$$a411 - Computational Science and Mathematical Methods (POF2-411)$$cPOF2-411$$fPOF II$$x1
000019674 542__ $$2Crossref$$i2012-01-04$$uhttp://link.aps.org/licenses/aps-default-license
000019674 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science
000019674 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000019674 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)138295$$aMichielsen, K.$$b1$$uFZJ
000019674 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aHess, K.$$b2
000019674 77318 $$2Crossref$$3journal-article$$a10.1103/physreva.85.012101$$bAmerican Physical Society (APS)$$d2012-01-04$$n1$$p012101$$tPhysical Review A$$v85$$x1050-2947$$y2012
000019674 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2844156-4$$a10.1103/PhysRevA.85.012101$$gVol. 85, p. 012101$$n1$$p012101$$q85<012101$$tPhysical review / A$$v85$$x1050-2947$$y2012
000019674 8567_ $$uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.85.012101
000019674 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/19674/files/PhysRevA.85.012101.pdf$$yOpenAccess
000019674 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/19674/files/PhysRevA.85.012101.gif?subformat=icon$$xicon$$yOpenAccess
000019674 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/19674/files/PhysRevA.85.012101.jpg?subformat=icon-180$$xicon-180$$yOpenAccess
000019674 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/19674/files/PhysRevA.85.012101.jpg?subformat=icon-700$$xicon-700$$yOpenAccess
000019674 8564_ $$uhttps://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/19674/files/PhysRevA.85.012101.pdf?subformat=pdfa$$xpdfa$$yOpenAccess
000019674 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:19674$$pdnbdelivery$$pVDB$$pdriver$$popen_access$$popenaire
000019674 9141_ $$y2012
000019674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000019674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)1040$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bZoological Record
000019674 915__ $$0LIC:(DE-HGF)APS-112012$$2HGFVOC$$aAmerican Physical Society Transfer of Copyright Agreement
000019674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR
000019674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0200$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bSCOPUS
000019674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0110$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index
000019674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000019674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0510$$2StatID$$aOpenAccess
000019674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0010$$2StatID$$aJCR/ISI refereed
000019674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000019674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0420$$2StatID$$aNationallizenz
000019674 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000019674 9132_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-511$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-510$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lSupercomputing & Big Data$$vComputational Science and Mathematical Methods$$x0
000019674 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-411$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF2-410$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF2-400$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF2$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bSchlüsseltechnologien$$lSupercomputing$$vComputational Science and Mathematical Methods$$x1
000019674 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406$$gJSC$$kJSC$$lJülich Supercomputing Centre$$x0
000019674 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)134565
000019674 980__ $$aVDB
000019674 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000019674 980__ $$ajournal
000019674 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)JSC-20090406
000019674 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED
000019674 9801_ $$aFullTexts
000019674 999C5 $$2Crossref$$9-- missing cx lookup --$$a10.1142/S021773239400294X
000019674 999C5 $$2Crossref$$9-- missing cx lookup --$$a10.1126/science.1190545
000019674 999C5 $$1A. Taflove$$2Crossref$$oA. Taflove Computational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method 2005$$tComputational Electrodynamics: The Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method$$y2005
000019674 999C5 $$1M. Born$$2Crossref$$9-- missing cx lookup --$$a10.1017/CBO9781139644181$$y1964
000019674 999C5 $$2Crossref$$9-- missing cx lookup --$$a10.1038/nphys264
000019674 999C5 $$2Crossref$$9-- missing cx lookup --$$a10.1038/nphys364
000019674 999C5 $$1C. Roychoudhuri$$2Crossref$$oC. Roychoudhuri Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations - 5 2010$$tQuantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations - 5$$y2010
000019674 999C5 $$2Crossref$$9-- missing cx lookup --$$a10.1117/1.3467504
000019674 999C5 $$1R. P. Feynman$$2Crossref$$oR. P. Feynman Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals 1965$$tQuantum Mechanics and Path Integrals$$y1965
000019674 999C5 $$2Crossref$$9-- missing cx lookup --$$a10.1016/j.physleta.2008.09.023
000019674 999C5 $$2Crossref$$9-- missing cx lookup --$$a10.1007/s10701-010-9429-z
000019674 999C5 $$2Crossref$$9-- missing cx lookup --$$a10.1126/science.1192624
000019674 999C5 $$1P. Nyman$$2Crossref$$oP. Nyman Advances in Quantum Theory 2011$$tAdvances in Quantum Theory$$y2011
000019674 999C5 $$2Crossref$$9-- missing cx lookup --$$a10.1119/1.14783
000019674 999C5 $$1L. E. Ballentine$$2Crossref$$oL. E. Ballentine Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development 2003$$tQuantum Mechanics: A Modern Development$$y2003
000019674 999C5 $$2Crossref$$9-- missing cx lookup --$$a10.1063/1.524312