% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Bzdok:19772,
      author       = {Bzdok, D. and Schilbach, L. and Vogeley, K. and Schneider,
                      K. and Laird, A.R. and Langner, R. and Eickhoff, S.B.},
      title        = {{P}arsing the neural correlates of moral cognition: {ALE}
                      meta-analysis on morality, theory of mind, and empathy},
      journal      = {Brain structure $\&$ function},
      volume       = {217},
      issn         = {1863-2653},
      address      = {Berlin},
      publisher    = {Springer},
      reportid     = {PreJuSER-19772},
      pages        = {783 - 796},
      year         = {2012},
      note         = {This study was supported by the German Research Council
                      (DFG, IRTG 1328; KZ, SBE, DB), the Human Brain Project
                      (R01-MH074457-01A1; ARL, SBE), and the Helmholtz Initiative
                      on Systems Biology (Human Brain Model; KZ, SBE). The authors
                      declare no conflict of interest.},
      abstract     = {Morally judicious behavior forms the fabric of human
                      sociality. Here, we sought to investigate neural activity
                      associated with different facets of moral thought. Previous
                      research suggests that the cognitive and emotional sources
                      of moral decisions might be closely related to theory of
                      mind, an abstract-cognitive skill, and empathy, a
                      rapid-emotional skill. That is, moral decisions are thought
                      to crucially refer to other persons' representation of
                      intentions and behavioral outcomes as well as (vicariously
                      experienced) emotional states. We thus hypothesized that
                      moral decisions might be implemented in brain areas engaged
                      in 'theory of mind' and empathy. This assumption was tested
                      by conducting a large-scale activation likelihood estimation
                      (ALE) meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies, which assessed
                      2,607 peak coordinates from 247 experiments in 1,790
                      participants. The brain areas that were consistently
                      involved in moral decisions showed more convergence with the
                      ALE analysis targeting theory of mind versus empathy. More
                      specifically, the neurotopographical overlap between
                      morality and empathy disfavors a role of affective sharing
                      during moral decisions. Ultimately, our results provide
                      evidence that the neural network underlying moral decisions
                      is probably domain-global and might be dissociable into
                      cognitive and affective sub-systems.},
      keywords     = {J (WoSType)},
      cin          = {INM-1 / INM-2 / INM-3},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-1-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-2-20090406 /
                      I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {Funktion und Dysfunktion des Nervensystems (FUEK409) /
                      89572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF2-89572)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK409 / G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89572},
      shelfmark    = {Anatomy $\&$ Morphology / Neurosciences},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:22270812},
      pmc          = {pmc:PMC3445793},
      UT           = {WOS:000308964300002},
      doi          = {10.1007/s00429-012-0380-y},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/19772},
}