000019851 001__ 19851
000019851 005__ 20210129210735.0
000019851 0247_ $$2pmid$$apmid:21276844
000019851 0247_ $$2pmc$$apmc:PMC3360525
000019851 0247_ $$2DOI$$a10.1016/j.heares.2011.01.013
000019851 0247_ $$2WOS$$aWOS:000293726600018
000019851 037__ $$aPreJuSER-19851
000019851 041__ $$aeng
000019851 082__ $$a570
000019851 084__ $$2WoS$$aNeurosciences
000019851 084__ $$2WoS$$aOtorhinolaryngology
000019851 1001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aRiecke, L.$$b0
000019851 245__ $$aRecalibration of the auditory continuity illusion: Sensory and decisional effects
000019851 260__ $$aAmsterdam [u.a.]$$bElsevier Science$$c2011
000019851 300__ $$a152–162
000019851 3367_ $$0PUB:(DE-HGF)16$$2PUB:(DE-HGF)$$aJournal Article
000019851 3367_ $$2DataCite$$aOutput Types/Journal article
000019851 3367_ $$00$$2EndNote$$aJournal Article
000019851 3367_ $$2BibTeX$$aARTICLE
000019851 3367_ $$2ORCID$$aJOURNAL_ARTICLE
000019851 3367_ $$2DRIVER$$aarticle
000019851 440_0 $$025405$$aHearing Research$$v277$$y1
000019851 500__ $$aThis work was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) Cognitie programma Grant 05104020. The authors thank Andrew Oxenham for useful discussions. Author CM is supported by an NIH grant (R01 DC007657).
000019851 520__ $$aAn interrupted sound can be perceived as continuous when noise masks the interruption, creating an illusion of continuity. Recent findings have shown that adaptor sounds preceding an ambiguous target sound can influence listeners' rating of target continuity. However, it remains unclear whether these aftereffects on perceived continuity influence sensory processes, decisional processes (i.e., criterion shifts), or both. The present study addressed this question. Results show that the target sound was more likely to be rated as 'continuous' when preceded by adaptors that were perceived as clearly discontinuous than when it was preceded by adaptors that were heard (illusorily or veridically) as continuous. Detection-theory analyses indicated that these contrastive aftereffects reflect a combination of sensory and decisional processes. The contrastive sensory aftereffect persisted even when adaptors and targets were presented to opposite ears, suggesting a neural origin in structures that receive binaural inputs. Finally, physically identical but perceptually ambiguous adaptors that were rated as 'continuous' induced more reports of target continuity than adaptors that were rated as 'discontinuous'. This assimilative aftereffect was purely decisional. These findings confirm that judgments of auditory continuity can be influenced by preceding events, and reveal that these aftereffects have both sensory and decisional components.
000019851 536__ $$0G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK409$$2G:(DE-HGF)$$aFunktion und Dysfunktion des Nervensystems (FUEK409)$$cFUEK409$$x0
000019851 536__ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89571$$a89571 - Connectivity and Activity (POF2-89571)$$cPOF2-89571$$fPOF II T$$x1
000019851 588__ $$aDataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed
000019851 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aAcoustic Stimulation
000019851 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aAdaptation, Physiological
000019851 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aAdaptation, Psychological
000019851 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aAdult
000019851 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aAudiometry
000019851 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aAuditory Pathways: physiology
000019851 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aAuditory Perception
000019851 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aAuditory Threshold
000019851 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aCues
000019851 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aDecision Theory
000019851 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aFemale
000019851 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aHumans
000019851 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aIllusions
000019851 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aMale
000019851 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aMiddle Aged
000019851 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aNoise: adverse effects
000019851 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aPerceptual Masking
000019851 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aPsychoacoustics
000019851 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aTime Factors
000019851 650_2 $$2MeSH$$aYoung Adult
000019851 650_7 $$2WoSType$$aJ
000019851 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMicheyl, C.$$b1
000019851 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aVanbussel, M.$$b2
000019851 7001_ $$0P:(DE-Juel1)VDB104568$$aSchreiner, C.S.$$b3$$uFZJ
000019851 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aMendelsohn, D.$$b4
000019851 7001_ $$0P:(DE-HGF)0$$aFormisano, E.$$b5
000019851 773__ $$0PERI:(DE-600)2006374-X$$a10.1016/j.heares.2011.01.013$$gVol. 277$$p152–162$$q277$$tHearing research$$v277$$x0378-5955$$y2011
000019851 8567_ $$2Pubmed Central$$uhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3360525
000019851 909CO $$ooai:juser.fz-juelich.de:19851$$pVDB
000019851 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0040$$2StatID$$aPeer review unknown
000019851 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0100$$2StatID$$aJCR
000019851 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0111$$2StatID$$aWoS$$bScience Citation Index Expanded
000019851 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0150$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bWeb of Science Core Collection
000019851 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0199$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bThomson Reuters Master Journal List
000019851 915__ $$0StatID:(DE-HGF)0300$$2StatID$$aDBCoverage$$bMedline
000019851 9141_ $$y2011
000019851 9132_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF3-571$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500$$aDE-HGF$$bKey Technologies$$lDecoding the Human Brain$$vConnectivity and Activity$$x0
000019851 9131_ $$0G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89571$$1G:(DE-HGF)POF3-890$$2G:(DE-HGF)POF3-800$$3G:(DE-HGF)POF3$$4G:(DE-HGF)POF$$aDE-HGF$$bProgrammungebundene Forschung$$lohne Programm$$vConnectivity and Activity$$x1
000019851 9201_ $$0I:(DE-Juel1)INM-2-20090406$$gINM$$kINM-2$$lMolekulare Organisation des Gehirns$$x0
000019851 970__ $$aVDB:(DE-Juel1)134865
000019851 980__ $$aVDB
000019851 980__ $$aConvertedRecord
000019851 980__ $$ajournal
000019851 980__ $$aI:(DE-Juel1)INM-2-20090406
000019851 980__ $$aUNRESTRICTED