% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Riecke:19851,
author = {Riecke, L. and Micheyl, C. and Vanbussel, M. and Schreiner,
C.S. and Mendelsohn, D. and Formisano, E.},
title = {{R}ecalibration of the auditory continuity illusion:
{S}ensory and decisional effects},
journal = {Hearing research},
volume = {277},
issn = {0378-5955},
address = {Amsterdam [u.a.]},
publisher = {Elsevier Science},
reportid = {PreJuSER-19851},
pages = {152–162},
year = {2011},
note = {This work was supported by the Netherlands Organization for
Scientific Research (NWO) Cognitie programma Grant 05104020.
The authors thank Andrew Oxenham for useful discussions.
Author CM is supported by an NIH grant (R01 DC007657).},
abstract = {An interrupted sound can be perceived as continuous when
noise masks the interruption, creating an illusion of
continuity. Recent findings have shown that adaptor sounds
preceding an ambiguous target sound can influence listeners'
rating of target continuity. However, it remains unclear
whether these aftereffects on perceived continuity influence
sensory processes, decisional processes (i.e., criterion
shifts), or both. The present study addressed this question.
Results show that the target sound was more likely to be
rated as 'continuous' when preceded by adaptors that were
perceived as clearly discontinuous than when it was preceded
by adaptors that were heard (illusorily or veridically) as
continuous. Detection-theory analyses indicated that these
contrastive aftereffects reflect a combination of sensory
and decisional processes. The contrastive sensory
aftereffect persisted even when adaptors and targets were
presented to opposite ears, suggesting a neural origin in
structures that receive binaural inputs. Finally, physically
identical but perceptually ambiguous adaptors that were
rated as 'continuous' induced more reports of target
continuity than adaptors that were rated as 'discontinuous'.
This assimilative aftereffect was purely decisional. These
findings confirm that judgments of auditory continuity can
be influenced by preceding events, and reveal that these
aftereffects have both sensory and decisional components.},
keywords = {Acoustic Stimulation / Adaptation, Physiological /
Adaptation, Psychological / Adult / Audiometry / Auditory
Pathways: physiology / Auditory Perception / Auditory
Threshold / Cues / Decision Theory / Female / Humans /
Illusions / Male / Middle Aged / Noise: adverse effects /
Perceptual Masking / Psychoacoustics / Time Factors / Young
Adult / J (WoSType)},
cin = {INM-2},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-2-20090406},
pnm = {Funktion und Dysfunktion des Nervensystems (FUEK409) /
89571 - Connectivity and Activity (POF2-89571)},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK409 / G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89571},
shelfmark = {Neurosciences / Otorhinolaryngology},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
pubmed = {pmid:21276844},
pmc = {pmc:PMC3360525},
UT = {WOS:000293726600018},
doi = {10.1016/j.heares.2011.01.013},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/19851},
}