Home > Publications database > Recalibration of the auditory continuity illusion: Sensory and decisional effects > print

001     19851
005     20210129210735.0
024 7 _ |2 pmid
|a pmid:21276844
024 7 _ |2 pmc
|a pmc:PMC3360525
024 7 _ |2 DOI
|a 10.1016/j.heares.2011.01.013
024 7 _ |2 WOS
|a WOS:000293726600018
037 _ _ |a PreJuSER-19851
041 _ _ |a eng
082 _ _ |a 570
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Neurosciences
084 _ _ |2 WoS
|a Otorhinolaryngology
100 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Riecke, L.
|b 0
245 _ _ |a Recalibration of the auditory continuity illusion: Sensory and decisional effects
260 _ _ |a Amsterdam [u.a.]
|b Elsevier Science
|c 2011
300 _ _ |a 152–162
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 PUB:(DE-HGF)16
|2 PUB:(DE-HGF)
336 7 _ |a Output Types/Journal article
|2 DataCite
336 7 _ |a Journal Article
|0 0
|2 EndNote
336 7 _ |a ARTICLE
|2 BibTeX
336 7 _ |a JOURNAL_ARTICLE
|2 ORCID
336 7 _ |a article
|2 DRIVER
440 _ 0 |0 25405
|a Hearing Research
|v 277
|y 1
500 _ _ |a This work was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) Cognitie programma Grant 05104020. The authors thank Andrew Oxenham for useful discussions. Author CM is supported by an NIH grant (R01 DC007657).
520 _ _ |a An interrupted sound can be perceived as continuous when noise masks the interruption, creating an illusion of continuity. Recent findings have shown that adaptor sounds preceding an ambiguous target sound can influence listeners' rating of target continuity. However, it remains unclear whether these aftereffects on perceived continuity influence sensory processes, decisional processes (i.e., criterion shifts), or both. The present study addressed this question. Results show that the target sound was more likely to be rated as 'continuous' when preceded by adaptors that were perceived as clearly discontinuous than when it was preceded by adaptors that were heard (illusorily or veridically) as continuous. Detection-theory analyses indicated that these contrastive aftereffects reflect a combination of sensory and decisional processes. The contrastive sensory aftereffect persisted even when adaptors and targets were presented to opposite ears, suggesting a neural origin in structures that receive binaural inputs. Finally, physically identical but perceptually ambiguous adaptors that were rated as 'continuous' induced more reports of target continuity than adaptors that were rated as 'discontinuous'. This assimilative aftereffect was purely decisional. These findings confirm that judgments of auditory continuity can be influenced by preceding events, and reveal that these aftereffects have both sensory and decisional components.
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK409
|2 G:(DE-HGF)
|x 0
|c FUEK409
|a Funktion und Dysfunktion des Nervensystems (FUEK409)
536 _ _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89571
|a 89571 - Connectivity and Activity (POF2-89571)
|c POF2-89571
|f POF II T
|x 1
588 _ _ |a Dataset connected to Web of Science, Pubmed
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Acoustic Stimulation
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Adaptation, Physiological
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Adaptation, Psychological
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Adult
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Audiometry
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Auditory Pathways: physiology
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Auditory Perception
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Auditory Threshold
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Cues
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Decision Theory
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Female
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Humans
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Illusions
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Male
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Middle Aged
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Noise: adverse effects
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Perceptual Masking
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Psychoacoustics
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Time Factors
650 _ 2 |2 MeSH
|a Young Adult
650 _ 7 |2 WoSType
|a J
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Micheyl, C.
|b 1
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Vanbussel, M.
|b 2
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-Juel1)VDB104568
|a Schreiner, C.S.
|b 3
|u FZJ
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Mendelsohn, D.
|b 4
700 1 _ |0 P:(DE-HGF)0
|a Formisano, E.
|b 5
773 _ _ |0 PERI:(DE-600)2006374-X
|a 10.1016/j.heares.2011.01.013
|g Vol. 277
|p 152–162
|q 277
|t Hearing research
|v 277
|x 0378-5955
|y 2011
856 7 _ |2 Pubmed Central
|u http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3360525
909 C O |o oai:juser.fz-juelich.de:19851
|p VDB
913 2 _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-571
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-570
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-500
|a DE-HGF
|b Key Technologies
|l Decoding the Human Brain
|v Connectivity and Activity
|x 0
913 1 _ |0 G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89571
|a DE-HGF
|v Connectivity and Activity
|x 1
|4 G:(DE-HGF)POF
|1 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-890
|3 G:(DE-HGF)POF3
|2 G:(DE-HGF)POF3-800
|b Programmungebundene Forschung
|l ohne Programm
914 1 _ |y 2011
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0040
|2 StatID
|a Peer review unknown
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0100
|2 StatID
|a JCR
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0111
|2 StatID
|a WoS
|b Science Citation Index Expanded
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0150
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Web of Science Core Collection
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0199
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Thomson Reuters Master Journal List
915 _ _ |0 StatID:(DE-HGF)0300
|2 StatID
|a DBCoverage
|b Medline
920 1 _ |0 I:(DE-Juel1)INM-2-20090406
|g INM
|k INM-2
|l Molekulare Organisation des Gehirns
|x 0
970 _ _ |a VDB:(DE-Juel1)134865
980 _ _ |a VDB
980 _ _ |a ConvertedRecord
980 _ _ |a journal
980 _ _ |a I:(DE-Juel1)INM-2-20090406
980 _ _ |a UNRESTRICTED

LibraryCollectionCLSMajorCLSMinorLanguageAuthor
Marc 21