% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Steinborn:19853,
      author       = {Steinborn, M.B. and Langner, R.},
      title        = {{D}istraction by irrelevant sound during foreperiods
                      selectively impairs temporal preparation:
                      {W}iley-{B}lackwell},
      journal      = {Acta physiologica},
      volume       = {136},
      issn         = {1748-1708},
      reportid     = {PreJuSER-19853},
      pages        = {405 - 418},
      year         = {2011},
      note         = {Record converted from VDB: 12.11.2012},
      abstract     = {When the interval between a warning signal (WS) and an
                      imperative signal (IS), termed the foreperiod (FP), is
                      variable across trials, reaction time (RT) to the IS
                      typically decreases with increasing FP length. Here we
                      examined the auditory filled-FP effect, which refers to a
                      performance decrement after FPs filled with irrelevant
                      auditory stimulation compared to FPs without additional
                      stimulation. According to one account, irrelevant
                      stimulation distracts individuals from processing time and
                      probability information during the FP (distraction-during-FP
                      hypothesis). This should predominantly affect long-FP
                      trials. Alternatively, the filled-FP effect may arise from a
                      failure to shift attention from FP modality to IS modality
                      (attention-to-modality hypothesis). The first hypothesis
                      focuses on preparatory processing, predicting a selective RT
                      increase on long-FP trials, whereas the second hypothesis
                      focuses on target processing, only predicting a global RT
                      increase irrespective of FP length. Across four experiments,
                      a filled-FP (compared to a blank-FP) condition consistently
                      yielded a selective RT increase on long-FP trials,
                      irrespective of FP-IS modality pairing. This pattern of
                      results contradicts the attention-to-modality hypothesis but
                      corroborates the distraction-during-FP hypothesis. More
                      generally, these data have theoretical implications by
                      supporting a multi-process view of temporal preparation
                      under time uncertainty.},
      keywords     = {Acoustic Stimulation / Adult / Analysis of Variance /
                      Attention: physiology / Auditory Perception: physiology /
                      Female / Humans / Male / Photic Stimulation / Reaction Time:
                      physiology / Time Perception: physiology / Visual
                      Perception: physiology},
      cin          = {INM-2},
      ddc          = {610},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-2-20090406},
      pnm          = {Funktion und Dysfunktion des Nervensystems (FUEK409) /
                      89571 - Connectivity and Activity (POF2-89571)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK409 / G:(DE-HGF)POF2-89571},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      pubmed       = {pmid:21333960},
      UT           = {WOS:000289609200017},
      doi          = {10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.01.008},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/19853},
}