% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Gatz:19932,
author = {Gatz, S. and Dullweber, T. and Mertens, V. and Einsele, F.
and Brendel, R.},
title = {{F}iring stability of {S}i{N}(y)/{S}i{N}(x) stacks for the
surface passivation of crystalline silicon solar cells},
journal = {Solar energy materials $\&$ solar cells},
volume = {96},
issn = {0927-0248},
address = {Amsterdam},
publisher = {North Holland},
reportid = {PreJuSER-19932},
pages = {180 - 185},
year = {2012},
note = {The authors thank M. Perutz, S. Braunig, S. Spatlich and S.
Wyczanowski for the sample preparation. This work was
supported by the German Federal Ministry for the
Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety under
Contract No. 0327529A, which is gratefully acknowledged.},
abstract = {In the photovoltaic industry contacts to crystalline
silicon are typically formed by firing of screen-printed
metallization pastes. However, the stability of surface
passivation layers during high temperature contact formation
is a major challenge. Here, we investigate the thermal
stability of the surface passivation by amorphous silicon
nitride double layers (SiNy/SiNx). The SiNy passivation
layer is silicon rich with refractive index larger than 3.
Whereas the SiNx capping layer has a refractive index of
2.05. Compared to pure hydrogenated amorphous silicon, the
nitrogen in the SiNy passivation layer improves the firing
stability. We achieve an effective surface recombination
velocity after a conventional co-firing process of (5.2 +/-
2) cm/s on p-type (1.5 Omega cm) FZ-silicon wafers at an
injection density of 10(15) cm(-3). An analysis of the
improved firing stability is presented based on FTIR and
hydrogen effusion measurements. The incorporation of an
SiNy/SiNx stack into the passivated rear of Cz silicon
screen-printed solar cells results in an energy conversion
efficiency of $18.3\%$ compared to reference solar cells
with conventional aluminum back surface field showing
$17.9\%$ efficiency. The short circuit current density
increases by up to 0.8 mA/cm(2) compared to conventional
solar cells due to the improved optical reflectance and rear
side surface passivation. (C) 2011 Elsevier By. All rights
reserved.},
keywords = {J (WoSType)},
cin = {IEK-5},
ddc = {530},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IEK-5-20101013},
pnm = {Erneuerbare Energien},
pid = {G:(DE-Juel1)FUEK401},
shelfmark = {Energy $\&$ Fuels / Materials Science, Multidisciplinary},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000298534000025},
doi = {10.1016/j.solmat.2011.09.051},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/19932},
}