% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Chen:200855,
author = {Chen, Bin J. W. and During, Heinjo J. and Vermeulen, Peter
J. and de Kroon, Hans and Poorter, Hendrik and Anten, Niels
P. R.},
title = {{C}orrections for rooting volume and plant size reveal
negative effects of neighbour presence on root allocation in
peaplant},
journal = {Functional ecology},
volume = {29},
number = {11},
issn = {0269-8463},
address = {Oxford [u.a.]},
publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell},
reportid = {FZJ-2015-03230},
pages = {1383–1391},
year = {2015},
abstract = {1. Plants are able to detect the presence of their
neighbours below-ground. The associated root responses may
affect plant performance, plant–plant interactions and
community dynamics, but the extent and direction of these
responses is heavily debated. 2. Some studies suggest that
plants will over-proliferate roots in response to neighbours
at the expense of reproduction, which was framed as a
‘tragedy of the commons’. Others propose an ‘ideal
free distribution’ hypothesis stating that plants produce
roots simply as a function of the amount of available
nutrients. However, experimental evidence for either
hypothesis that is unbiased by confounding effects of
rooting volume and plant size in their experimental set-ups
is still lacking. 3. We grew split-root pea plants in the
presence or absence of a below-ground neighbour at a range
of rooting volumes, while providing equal amounts of
nutrients per plant. Path analyses were used to disentangle
the direct effects of neighbour presence on allocation
patterns from the confounding effects of rooting volume and
plant size. 4. Within the chosen range of rooting volumes,
the presence of a below-ground neighbour generally reduced
plant root mass by $21\%$ and total mass by $9\%.$ A
doubling of rooting volume generally increased plant root
mass by $22\%$ and total mass by $11\%.$ Pod mass was only
directly and positively correlated with vegetative mass. 5.
The presence of a below-ground neighbour induced less root
allocation but more pod allocation, whereas increased
rooting volume caused a reduction in reproductive
allocation. A large part of these effects, however, was
indirectly mediated through the influence on plant total
mass. 6. Synthesis. Not considering the effects of rooting
volume and plant size may lead to misinterpretations of
plant growth strategies in response to neighbours.
Accounting for these factors, we found pea allocating less
mass to roots in the presence of a below-ground neighbour.
The obtained results can help to reconcile the various
responses to below-ground neighbours as they are published
in the literature.},
cin = {IBG-2},
ddc = {570},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
pnm = {582 - Plant Science (POF3-582)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000364312600003},
doi = {10.1111/1365-2435.12450},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/200855},
}