% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded. This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.
@ARTICLE{Volz:200992,
author = {Volz, L. J. and Eickhoff, Simon and Pool, Eva-Maria and
Fink, Gereon Rudolf and Grefkes, Christian},
title = {{D}ifferential {M}odulation of {M}otor {N}etwork
{C}onnectivity during {M}ovements of the {U}pper and {L}ower
{L}imbs},
journal = {NeuroImage},
volume = {119},
issn = {1053-8119},
address = {Orlando, Fla.},
publisher = {Academic Press},
reportid = {FZJ-2015-03311},
pages = {44-53},
year = {2015},
abstract = {Voluntary movements depend on a well-regulated interplay
between the primary motor cortex (M1) and premotor areas.
While to date the neural underpinnings of hand movements are
relatively well understood, we only have rather limited
knowledge on the cortical control of lower-limb movements.
Given that our hands and feet have different roles for
activities of daily living, with hand movements being more
frequently used in a lateralized fashion, we hypothesized
that such behavioral differences also impact onto network
dynamics underlying upper and lower limb movements. We,
therefore, used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)
and dynamic causal modeling (DCM) to investigate differences
in effective connectivity underlying isolated movements of
the hands or feet in 16 healthy subjects. The connectivity
analyses revealed that both movements of the hand and feet
were accompanied by strong facilitatory coupling of the
respective contralateral M1 representations with premotor
areas of both hemispheres. However, excitatory influences
were significantly lower for movements of the feet compared
to hand movements. During hand movements, the M1hand
representation ipsilateral to the movement was strongly
inhibited by premotor regions and the contralateral M1
homologue. In contrast, interhemispheric inhibition was
absent between the M1foot representations during foot
movements. Furthermore, M1foot ipsilateral to the moving
foot exerted promoting influences onto contralateral M1foot.
In conclusion, the generally stronger and more lateralized
coupling pattern associated with hand movements suggests
distinct fine-tuning of cortical control to underlie
voluntary movements with the upper compared to the lower
limb.},
cin = {INM-3 / INM-1},
ddc = {610},
cid = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406 / I:(DE-Juel1)INM-1-20090406},
pnm = {572 - (Dys-)function and Plasticity (POF3-572)},
pid = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-572},
typ = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
UT = {WOS:000361182400005},
pubmed = {pmid:26095089},
doi = {10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.05.101},
url = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/200992},
}