% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Schilbach:201371,
      author       = {Schilbach, Leonhard and Timmermans, Bert and Reddy,
                      Vasudevi and Costall, Alan and Bente, Gary and Schlicht,
                      Tobias and Vogeley, Kai},
      title        = {{A} second-person neuroscience in interaction},
      journal      = {Behavioral and brain sciences},
      volume       = {36},
      number       = {04},
      issn         = {1469-1825},
      address      = {New York, NY [u.a.]},
      publisher    = {Cambridge Univ. Press},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2015-03666},
      pages        = {441 - 462},
      year         = {2013},
      abstract     = {In this response we address additions to as well as
                      criticisms and possible misinterpretations of our proposal
                      for a second-person neuroscience. We map out the most
                      crucial aspects of our approach by (1) acknowledging that
                      second-person engaged interaction is not the only way to
                      understand others, although we claim that it is
                      ontogenetically prior; (2) claiming that spectatorial
                      paradigms need to be complemented in order to enable a full
                      understanding of social interactions; and (3) restating that
                      our theoretical proposal not only questions the mechanism by
                      which a cognitive process comes into being, but asks whether
                      it is at all meaningful to speak of a mechanism and a
                      cognitive process when it is confined to intra-agent space.
                      We address theoretical criticisms of our approach by
                      pointing out that while a second-person social understanding
                      may not be the only mechanism, alternative approaches cannot
                      hold their ground without resorting to second-person
                      concepts, if not in the expression, certainly in the
                      development of social understanding. In this context, we
                      also address issues of agency and intentionality,
                      theoretical alternatives, and clinical implications of our
                      approach.},
      cin          = {INM-3},
      ddc          = {400},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)INM-3-20090406},
      pnm          = {333 - Pathophysiological Mechanisms of Neurological and
                      Psychiatric Diseases (POF2-333)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF2-333},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000322225700064},
      doi          = {10.1017/S0140525X12002452},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/201371},
}