% IMPORTANT: The following is UTF-8 encoded.  This means that in the presence
% of non-ASCII characters, it will not work with BibTeX 0.99 or older.
% Instead, you should use an up-to-date BibTeX implementation like “bibtex8” or
% “biber”.

@ARTICLE{Gioia:201957,
      author       = {Gioia, T. and Nagel, Kerstin and Beleggia, R. and Fragasso,
                      M. and Ficco, D. B. M. and Pieruschka, R. and De Vita, P.
                      and Fiorani, F. and Papa, R.},
      title        = {{I}mpact of domestication on the phenotypic architecture of
                      durum wheat under contrasting nitrogen fertilization},
      journal      = {The journal of experimental botany},
      volume       = {66},
      number       = {18},
      issn         = {0022-0957},
      address      = {Oxford},
      publisher    = {Univ. Press},
      reportid     = {FZJ-2015-04247},
      pages        = {5519-5530},
      year         = {2015},
      abstract     = {The process of domestication has led to dramatic
                      morphological and physiological changes in crop species due
                      toadaptation to cultivation and to the needs of farmers. To
                      investigate the phenotypic architecture of shoot- and
                      rootrelatedtraits and quantify the impact of primary and
                      secondary domestication, we examined a collection of 36
                      wheatgenotypes under optimal and nitrogen-starvation
                      conditions. These represented three taxa that correspond to
                      key stepsin the recent evolution of tetraploid wheat (i.e.
                      wild emmer, emmer, and durum wheat). Overall, nitrogen
                      starvationreduced the shoot growth of all genotypes, while
                      it induced the opposite effect on root traits, quantified
                      using theautomated phenotyping platform GROWSCREEN-Rhizo. We
                      observed an overall increase in all of the shoot and
                      rootgrowth traits from wild emmer to durum wheat, while
                      emmer was generally very similar to wild emmer but
                      intermediatebetween these two subspecies. While the
                      differences in phenotypic diversity due to the effects of
                      primary domesticationwere not significant, the secondary
                      domestication transition from emmer to durum wheat was
                      marked by a large andsignificant decrease in the coefficient
                      of additive genetic variation. In particular, this reduction
                      was very strong underthe optimal condition and less intense
                      under nitrogen starvation. Moreover, although under the
                      optimal condition bothroot and shoot traits showed
                      significantly reduced diversity due to secondary
                      domestication, under nitrogen starvationthe reduced
                      diversity was significant only for shoot traits. Overall, a
                      considerable amount of phenotypic variation wasobserved in
                      wild emmer and emmer, which could be exploited for the
                      development of pre-breeding strategies.},
      cin          = {IBG-2},
      ddc          = {580},
      cid          = {I:(DE-Juel1)IBG-2-20101118},
      pnm          = {582 - Plant Science (POF3-582) / EPPN - European Plant
                      Phenotyping Network (284443)},
      pid          = {G:(DE-HGF)POF3-582 / G:(EU-Grant)284443},
      typ          = {PUB:(DE-HGF)16},
      UT           = {WOS:000361208000012},
      pubmed       = {pmid:26071535},
      doi          = {10.1093/jxb/erv289},
      url          = {https://juser.fz-juelich.de/record/201957},
}